Dynamics of collective creativity in AI art competitions

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

This study analyzes 130,882 images from 368 Artbreeder 'remix parties' over 13 months, finding that collective human-AI co-created images become simpler and converge toward common thematic attractors, while users paradoxically prefer to remix less novel images despite novelty producing more engaged children.

arXiv:2605.17141v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Creativity is a fundamental aspect of how culture evolves, yet the mechanisms by which groups produce novelty are notoriously difficult to infer from the historical record. Iterated learning experiments have shown that cultural transmission reliably distorts artifacts toward the inductive biases of learners, but most of this work uses linear chains between human participants, leaving open how these dynamics play out in the networked, human-AI systems that increasingly shape cultural production. In this study, we leverage one such system, Artbreeder, which hosts daily "remix parties" where users iteratively build on each other's work from a single seed image, producing branching lineages of human-AI co-created images. We analyze a dataset of 130,882 images from 368 remix parties over 13 months and find that images become simpler and converge toward common thematic "attractors" (e.g., steampunk scenes, alien architecture). We also find that while more novel "parent" images produce more novel and complex "children" that attract more likes, users paradoxically prefer to remix images that are less novel and complex. Finally, larger remix parties produce more novelty at the cost of lower complexity.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/19/26, 06:39 AM

# Dynamics of collective creativity in AI art competitions
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17141](https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17141)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.17141)

> Abstract:Creativity is a fundamental aspect of how culture evolves, yet the mechanisms by which groups produce novelty are notoriously difficult to infer from the historical record\. Iterated learning experiments have shown that cultural transmission reliably distorts artifacts toward the inductive biases of learners, but most of this work uses linear chains between human participants, leaving open how these dynamics play out in the networked, human\-AI systems that increasingly shape cultural production\. In this study, we leverage one such system, Artbreeder, which hosts daily "remix parties" where users iteratively build on each other's work from a single seed image, producing branching lineages of human\-AI co\-created images\. We analyze a dataset of 130,882 images from 368 remix parties over 13 months and find that images become simpler and converge toward common thematic "attractors" \(e\.g\., steampunk scenes, alien architecture\)\. We also find that while more novel "parent" images produce more novel and complex "children" that attract more likes, users paradoxically prefer to remix images that are less novel and complex\. Finally, larger remix parties produce more novelty at the cost of lower complexity\.

## Submission history

From: Mason Youngblood \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/a853b375/2605.17141)\] **\[v1\]**Sat, 16 May 2026 20:16:31 UTC \(1,607 KB\)

Similar Articles

The End of Creativity

Hacker News Top

A personal anecdote about two wedding videos created with AI that ended up nearly identical, illustrating how AI tools are causing everyday creativity to regress to a mean.