Where does voice-agent latency still hide after you fix streaming?
Summary
The article discusses hidden sources of latency in voice-agent systems after streaming is enabled and seeks advice on which performance metrics are crucial for real-time agents.
Similar Articles
Your voice agent's biggest latency isn't always the model
Voice agents often face latency issues not mainly from the model but from components like endpointing; optimizing VAD and using proper benchmarking can reduce turn latency effectively.
6 months running a production voice agent for service businesses. The latency math is way harder than the demos suggest.
After 6 months running a voice AI agent for service businesses, the author reveals that real-world latency is bimodal (median ~800ms, p95 ~2.4s) and this p95 determines user perception. Issues like VAD misfires, function call degradation with long prompts, and TTS quality matter more than LLM choice, with multilingual support adding significant costs.
Voice agent latency: how to tell if it’s the model or the network
A guide on distinguishing whether latency in voice agents stems from the model or the network, helping developers identify bottlenecks.
Your voice agent probably isn't slow because of the LLM.
A developer debunks the common belief that LLM latency is the primary cause of slow voice agents, explaining that delays often stem from earlier stages like audio capture, VAD, and STT. They recommend logging specific latency metrics and testing various STT/TTS providers and orchestration frameworks to diagnose issues.
Best STT API for voice agents? I’d test latency before accuracy
The author argues that for live voice agents, STT latency and real-time behavior are more critical than raw transcription accuracy, and proposes a different evaluation scorecard.