OVO-S-Bench: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Streaming Spatial Intelligence in Multimodal LLMs
Summary
OVO-S-Bench introduces a comprehensive human-annotated benchmark of 1,680 questions across 348 videos to evaluate streaming spatial intelligence in multimodal LLMs, revealing that even the best model (Gemini-3.1-Pro) trails human experts by 27 points. The benchmark exposes key limitations including allocentric mapping as a major bottleneck and chain-of-thought reasoning amplifying spatial errors.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/05/26, 02:14 AM
Paper page - OVO-S-Bench: A Hierarchical Benchmark for Streaming Spatial Intelligence in Multimodal LLMs
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.03890
Abstract
OVO-S-Bench presents a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating streaming spatial intelligence in multimodal language models through human-annotated questions spanning multiple abstraction levels.
Multimodal agentsin robotics, AR, andautonomous drivingmust reason about places and layouts from continuousegocentric streams, often using evidence outside the current view. Existing benchmarks either evaluate offline over full videos or target events rather than spatial structure. We introduce OVO-S-Bench, a fully human-annotated benchmark forstreaming spatial intelligence, comprising 1,680 questions over 348 source videos. Annotation involves 12 trained annotators, each also serving as a blind cross-reviewer, across roughly 804 person-hours of multi-round quality assurance. Each question carries a query timestamp and an evidence interval, and at evaluation, the model sees only the prefix preceding the query. Questions span four levels of increasing abstraction: instantaneous egocentric perception, spatiotemporal context tracking, spatial simulation and reasoning, andallocentric mapping. Across 38 proprietary and open-source MLLMs, Gemini-3.1-Pro trails human experts by 27 points, 59.2 vs. 86.6, withallocentric mappingas the dominant bottleneck. Notably, streaming and spatially fine-tuned MLLMs underperform their own backbones. We further find thatchain-of-thought reasoningamplifies spatial errors when ungrounded in the stream. By exposing these limitations, OVO-S-Bench establishes a demanding testbed for next-generation streaming spatial MLLMs.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub30Add to collection
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.03890 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.03890 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.03890 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
Video-MME-Logical: A Controlled Diagnostic Benchmark for Video Temporal-Logical Reasoning
Introduces Video-MME-Logical, a controlled benchmark for evaluating video temporal-logical reasoning in multimodal large language models, revealing a substantial human-model gap.
SpatialWorld: Benchmarking Interactive Spatial Reasoning of Multimodal Agents in Real-World Tasks
SpatialWorld is a unified benchmark for evaluating interactive spatial reasoning in multimodal agents across diverse real-world tasks, revealing that even the strongest models achieve low task success rates.
SVI-Bench: A Dynamic Microworld for Strategic Video Intelligence
Introduces SVI-Bench, a large-scale benchmark for strategic video intelligence using team sports, designed to evaluate models on dynamic scene understanding, causal reasoning, strategic simulation, and agentic synthesis. The benchmark reveals a capability cliff where models perform well on perceptual tasks but sharply degrade on higher-level strategic reasoning.
MultiView-Bench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for World-Centric Multi-View Integration in VLMs
MultiView-Bench is a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating vision-language models on their ability to integrate multiple viewpoints into a coherent 3D mental model, revealing systematic failures in 3D spatial reasoning, and introducing ViewNavigator to mitigate these issues.
Almieyar-Oryx-BloomBench: A Bilingual Multimodal Benchmark for Cognitively Informed Evaluation of Vision-Language Models
BloomBench is a cognitively grounded bilingual (English-Arabic) multimodal benchmark for Vision-Language Models, systematically evaluating six cognitive levels based on Bloom's Taxonomy. Experiments reveal significant cognitive asymmetries and cross-lingual performance gaps in current models.