@_avichawla: I have been fine-tuning LLMs for over 3 years now. Here are 5 LLM fine-tuning techniques, explained with visuals: Tradi…
Summary
An educational post breaking down 5 parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) techniques for LLMs — LoRA, LoRA-FA, VeRA, Delta-LoRA, and LoRA+ — with visual explanations of how each adapts low-rank matrices to reduce memory and training costs.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/19/26, 11:30 PM
I have been fine-tuning LLMs for over 3 years now.
Here are 5 LLM fine-tuning techniques, explained with visuals:
Traditional fine‑tuning is impractical for LLMs (billions of params; 100s of GB).
Since this kind of compute isn’t accessible to everyone, parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques (PEFT) were built.
Before we go into details of each technique, here’s some background that will help you better understand these techniques:
LLM weights are matrices of numbers adjusted during fine-tuning.
Most PEFT techniques involve finding a lower-rank adaptation of these matrices, a smaller-dimensional matrix that can still represent the information stored in the original.
Now with a basic understanding of the rank of a matrix, we’re in a good position to understand the different fine-tuning techniques.
(refer to the image below for a visual explanation of each technique)
- LoRA
- Add two low-rank trainable matrices, A and B, alongside the weight matrices.
- Instead of fine-tuning W, adjust the updates in these low-rank matrices.
Even for the largest LLMs, LoRA matrices take up a few MBs of memory.
- LoRA-FA
While LoRA significantly decreases the total trainable parameters, it requires substantial activation memory to update the low-rank weights.
LoRA-FA (FA stands for Frozen-A) freezes matrix A and only updates matrix B.
- VeRA
- In LoRA, low-rank matrices A and B are unique for each layer.
- In VeRA, A and B are frozen, random, and shared across all layers.
- Instead, it learns layer-specific scaling VECTORS (b and d) instead.
- Delta-LoRA
- It tunes the matrix W as well, but not in the traditional way.
- Here, the difference (or delta) between the product of matrices A and B in two consecutive training steps is added to W.
- LoRA+
- In LoRA, both matrices A and B are updated with the same learning rate.
- Authors of LoRA+ found that setting a higher learning rate for matrix B results in better convergence.
Find me → @_avichawla Every day, I share tutorials and insights on DS, ML, LLMs, and RAGs.
Similar Articles
@techNmak: Everyone is fine-tuning LLMs. Almost nobody understands what is actually being updated inside the model. Here are 5 tec…
This article explains five parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques for large language models, such as LoRA and VeRA, detailing how each method adapts model weights with minimal updates.
@akshay_pachaar: LLM fine-tuning techniques I'd learn if I were to customize them: Bookmark this. 1. LoRA 2. QLoRA 3. Prefix Tuning 4. A…
The tweet lists 15 LLM fine-tuning techniques and introduces ART (Agent Reinforcement Trainer), an open-source framework from OpenPipe for training multi-step agents using GRPO, with serverless RL support via W&B Training.
How to Fine-Tune an LLM: An End-to-End Guide
This article provides a guide on fine-tuning LLMs, highlighting its benefits over RAG and system prompts with a case study where fine-tuning a Mistral 7B model improved accuracy from 35% to 98% for a medical reporting task.
@jbhuang0604: LoRA, low-rank adaptation, is arguably the most popular parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for LLMs. But how does i…
LoRA (low-rank adaptation) is the most popular parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for LLMs. This video introduces how LoRA and its variants (LoRA+, QLoRA, VeRA, DoRA) work.
Beyond LoRA: Can you beat the most popular fine-tuning technique?
Explores whether LoRA is the best parameter-efficient fine-tuning technique and introduces the PEFT library's tools to compare methods.