@_avichawla: I have been fine-tuning LLMs for over 3 years now. Here are 5 LLM fine-tuning techniques, explained with visuals: Tradi…

X AI KOLs Timeline News

Summary

An educational post breaking down 5 parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) techniques for LLMs — LoRA, LoRA-FA, VeRA, Delta-LoRA, and LoRA+ — with visual explanations of how each adapts low-rank matrices to reduce memory and training costs.

I have been fine-tuning LLMs for over 3 years now. Here are 5 LLM fine-tuning techniques, explained with visuals: Traditional fine‑tuning is impractical for LLMs (billions of params; 100s of GB). Since this kind of compute isn't accessible to everyone, parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques (PEFT) were built. Before we go into details of each technique, here's some background that will help you better understand these techniques: LLM weights are matrices of numbers adjusted during fine-tuning. Most PEFT techniques involve finding a lower-rank adaptation of these matrices, a smaller-dimensional matrix that can still represent the information stored in the original. Now with a basic understanding of the rank of a matrix, we're in a good position to understand the different fine-tuning techniques. (refer to the image below for a visual explanation of each technique) 1) LoRA - Add two low-rank trainable matrices, A and B, alongside the weight matrices. - Instead of fine-tuning W, adjust the updates in these low-rank matrices. Even for the largest LLMs, LoRA matrices take up a few MBs of memory. 2) LoRA-FA While LoRA significantly decreases the total trainable parameters, it requires substantial activation memory to update the low-rank weights. LoRA-FA (FA stands for Frozen-A) freezes matrix A and only updates matrix B. 3) VeRA - In LoRA, low-rank matrices A and B are unique for each layer. - In VeRA, A and B are frozen, random, and shared across all layers. - Instead, it learns layer-specific scaling VECTORS (b and d) instead. 4) Delta-LoRA - It tunes the matrix W as well, but not in the traditional way. - Here, the difference (or delta) between the product of matrices A and B in two consecutive training steps is added to W. 5) LoRA+ - In LoRA, both matrices A and B are updated with the same learning rate. - Authors of LoRA+ found that setting a higher learning rate for matrix B results in better convergence. ____ Find me → @_avichawla Every day, I share tutorials and insights on DS, ML, LLMs, and RAGs.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/19/26, 11:30 PM

I have been fine-tuning LLMs for over 3 years now.

Here are 5 LLM fine-tuning techniques, explained with visuals:

Traditional fine‑tuning is impractical for LLMs (billions of params; 100s of GB).

Since this kind of compute isn’t accessible to everyone, parameter-efficient fine-tuning techniques (PEFT) were built.

Before we go into details of each technique, here’s some background that will help you better understand these techniques:

LLM weights are matrices of numbers adjusted during fine-tuning.

Most PEFT techniques involve finding a lower-rank adaptation of these matrices, a smaller-dimensional matrix that can still represent the information stored in the original.

Now with a basic understanding of the rank of a matrix, we’re in a good position to understand the different fine-tuning techniques.

(refer to the image below for a visual explanation of each technique)

  1. LoRA
  • Add two low-rank trainable matrices, A and B, alongside the weight matrices.
  • Instead of fine-tuning W, adjust the updates in these low-rank matrices.

Even for the largest LLMs, LoRA matrices take up a few MBs of memory.

  1. LoRA-FA

While LoRA significantly decreases the total trainable parameters, it requires substantial activation memory to update the low-rank weights.

LoRA-FA (FA stands for Frozen-A) freezes matrix A and only updates matrix B.

  1. VeRA
  • In LoRA, low-rank matrices A and B are unique for each layer.
  • In VeRA, A and B are frozen, random, and shared across all layers.
  • Instead, it learns layer-specific scaling VECTORS (b and d) instead.
  1. Delta-LoRA
  • It tunes the matrix W as well, but not in the traditional way.
  • Here, the difference (or delta) between the product of matrices A and B in two consecutive training steps is added to W.
  1. LoRA+
  • In LoRA, both matrices A and B are updated with the same learning rate.
  • Authors of LoRA+ found that setting a higher learning rate for matrix B results in better convergence.

Find me → @_avichawla Every day, I share tutorials and insights on DS, ML, LLMs, and RAGs.

Similar Articles

How to Fine-Tune an LLM: An End-to-End Guide

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

This article provides a guide on fine-tuning LLMs, highlighting its benefits over RAG and system prompts with a case study where fine-tuning a Mistral 7B model improved accuracy from 35% to 98% for a medical reporting task.