Skill-based Agentic Evaluation for Real-time Data Science Tasks

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

This paper introduces a ground-truth-as-code framework for evaluating data-science agents on continuously updated data, achieving improved agreement with human evaluators and reduced token consumption.

arXiv:2609.16487v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a framework for evaluating data-science agents on live, continuously updated data using executable ground truth and format-agnostic factoid scoring. Consider this example query: "what were last week's audience sizes"---the reference answer changes as the underlying data changes, so static references become outdated and standard LLM-as-a-judge pipelines cannot verify responses against a fixed ground truth. Our central contribution, ground-truth-as-code, encodes each expected answer as an executable reference function that recomputes the answer directly from live data at evaluation time, ensuring the reference remains consistent with the system it describes. We combine this with a factoid-level, format-agnostic judge that decomposes both the agent's response and the computed ground truth into atomic claims and scores precision, recall, and accuracy over them, irrespective of the response format (prose, list, table, HTML, etc.). The approach is applicable to agents whose expected outputs can be expressed as executable data computations. We validate the framework through a human--LLM agreement study on an internally developed machine learning skill deployed in production, using a synthetic database constructed to reproduce production schemas and entity relationships. Relative to a natural-language ground-truth baseline, our method achieves a 29% improvement in the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC)---a class-balanced measure of agreement between expert annotators and LLM-as-a-judge predictions---and a 16% reduction in token consumption per test case, while a self-directed baseline lacking explicit ground truth is anti-correlated with human judgment. Agents that perform multi-source data integration and computation over non-stationary data are routinely deployed in industry; we propose ground-truth-as-code as a practical methodology for their evaluation.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/16/26, 09:00 AM

# Skill-based Agentic Evaluation for Real-time Data Science Tasks
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16487](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16487)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.16487)

> Abstract:We present a framework for evaluating data\-science agents on live, continuously updated data using executable ground truth and format\-agnostic factoid scoring\. Consider this example query: "what were last week's audience sizes"\-\-\-the reference answer changes as the underlying data changes, so static references become outdated and standard LLM\-as\-a\-judge pipelines cannot verify responses against a fixed ground truth\. Our central contribution, ground\-truth\-as\-code, encodes each expected answer as an executable reference function that recomputes the answer directly from live data at evaluation time, ensuring the reference remains consistent with the system it describes\. We combine this with a factoid\-level, format\-agnostic judge that decomposes both the agent's response and the computed ground truth into atomic claims and scores precision, recall, and accuracy over them, irrespective of the response format \(prose, list, table, HTML, etc\.\)\. The approach is applicable to agents whose expected outputs can be expressed as executable data computations\. We validate the framework through a human\-\-LLM agreement study on an internally developed machine learning skill deployed in production, using a synthetic database constructed to reproduce production schemas and entity relationships\. Relative to a natural\-language ground\-truth baseline, our method achieves a 29% improvement in the Matthews Correlation Coefficient \(MCC\)\-\-\-a class\-balanced measure of agreement between expert annotators and LLM\-as\-a\-judge predictions\-\-\-and a 16% reduction in token consumption per test case, while a self\-directed baseline lacking explicit ground truth is anti\-correlated with human judgment\. Agents that perform multi\-source data integration and computation over non\-stationary data are routinely deployed in industry; we propose ground\-truth\-as\-code as a practical methodology for their evaluation\.

## Submission history

From: Aniruddha Tamhane \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/d2498032/2609.16487)\] **\[v1\]**Tue, 15 Sep 2026 01:20:37 UTC \(23 KB\)

Similar Articles

An Empirical Study of Automating Agent Evaluation

arXiv cs.CL

This paper introduces EvalAgent, a system that automates the evaluation of AI agents by encoding domain-specific expertise, addressing the limitations of standard coding assistants in this task. It also presents AgentEvalBench, a benchmark for testing evaluation pipelines, and demonstrates significant improvements in evaluation reliability.

Neurodata Without Boredom: Benchmarking Agentic AI for Data Reuse

arXiv cs.LG

This paper benchmarks agentic AI systems on the task of loading, understanding, and reformatting fragmented neuroscience data, finding that while agents perform well on subtasks, they rarely achieve fully error-free end-to-end solutions and human oversight remains necessary.

Agents That Build Better Training Data (25 minute read)

TLDR AI

Autodata introduces an agentic data scientist that iteratively generates and refines synthetic training data, with meta-optimization to further improve data quality, achieving better results on computer science and legal reasoning tasks.