Contextual Value Alignment via Multilayer Combinatorial Fusion

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

This paper proposes MCF-CVA, a multilayer combinatorial fusion framework for contextual value alignment of LLMs, which uses multiple moral agents and an expansion-reduction process to better capture ethical pluralism and outperform single-agent baselines.

arXiv:2608.07642v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values remains a major challenge, especially for trustworthy AI. While existing approaches such as RLHF, CAI, and their variants have achieved promising results, they often rely on a single-agent framework and a unified reward system. This limits their ability to capture ethical pluralism, adapt to diverse moral contexts, and reflect the dynamics of multi-agent moral reasoning. In this work, we propose a framework that utilizes multilayer combinatorial fusion for contextual value alignment (MCF-CVA). At the first layer of the framework, it instantiates multiple moral agents, each fine-tuned to represent a distinctive value. Their outputs are then expanded combinatorially using both score- and rank-combinations as well as average and weighted aggregations. These combined models are then reduced to the same number of initial moral agents. This expansion and reduction (EAR) process continues for multi-layers until a stopping criterion is reached. The MCF-CVA framework leverages cognitive diversity between agents to mitigate conflicts and redundancies across multiple agents, producing responses that better reflect contextual human values. The framework using the EAR algorithm is performed on the dual architecture of Euclidean score space and Kemeny rank space. Empirical evaluations demonstrated that the proposed framework outperforms single-agent baselines, multi-agent single-layer results, and previous aggregation approaches on standard metrics, showing that the MCF-CVA framework provides a robust and effective mechanism for advancing contextual value alignment in LLMs.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/11/26, 08:02 AM

# Contextual Value Alignment via Multilayer Combinatorial Fusion
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07642](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07642)
[View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.07642)[HTML \(experimental\)](https://arxiv.org/html/2608.07642v1)

> Abstract:Aligning large language models \(LLMs\) with human values remains a major challenge, especially for trustworthy AI\. While existing approaches such as RLHF, CAI, and their variants have achieved promising results, they often rely on a single\-agent framework and a unified reward system\. This limits their ability to capture ethical pluralism, adapt to diverse moral contexts, and reflect the dynamics of multi\-agent moral reasoning\. In this work, we propose a framework that utilizes multilayer combinatorial fusion for contextual value alignment \(MCF\-CVA\)\. At the first layer of the framework, it instantiates multiple moral agents, each fine\-tuned to represent a distinctive value\. Their outputs are then expanded combinatorially using both score\- and rank\-combinations as well as average and weighted aggregations\. These combined models are then reduced to the same number of initial moral agents\. This expansion and reduction \(EAR\) process continues for multi\-layers until a stopping criterion is reached\. The MCF\-CVA framework leverages cognitive diversity between agents to mitigate conflicts and redundancies across multiple agents, producing responses that better reflect contextual human values\. The framework using the EAR algorithm is performed on the dual architecture of Euclidean score space and Kemeny rank space\. Empirical evaluations demonstrated that the proposed framework outperforms single\-agent baselines, multi\-agent single\-layer results, and previous aggregation approaches on standard metrics, showing that the MCF\-CVA framework provides a robust and effective mechanism for advancing contextual value alignment in LLMs\.

## Submission history

From: Yuanhong Wu \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/3a1ecfb8/2608.07642)\] **\[v1\]**Fri, 7 Aug 2026 16:22:33 UTC \(6,049 KB\)

Similar Articles

ContextAdapt: Evaluating Contextual Adaptation and Value Alignment in LLMs

arXiv cs.CL

The paper introduces ContextAdapt, an evaluation framework testing how well 12 LLMs adapt values like honesty, autonomy, and confidentiality across professional domains (medicine, law, finance, national security). Models achieve high appropriateness scores but fail to apply domain-specific justifications consistently, revealing localized failures when stakes vary.