FakeSpotter: A content and strategy agnostic Viral Misinformation Detection Tool
Summary
FakeSpotter is a content- and strategy-agnostic tool designed to estimate the viral misinformation risk of textual content by measuring structural fingerprints, using repeated LLM assessments and logistic regression classifiers, with reported macro F1 scores of 0.788 for short texts and 0.793 for long texts on a labeled corpus.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/18/26, 08:48 AM
# FakeSpotter: A content and strategy agnostic Viral Misinformation Detection Tool Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19152](https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19152) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.19152) > Abstract:Misinformation detection tools often rely on binary true and false classifications or models trained on historical examples, limiting their usefulness when novel misleading narratives emerge\. Here, we present FakeSpotter, a content\- and strategy\-agnostic tool designed to estimate the viral misinformation risk of textual content by measuring structural fingerprints of misinformation rather than directly adjudicating truthfulness\. FakeSpotter operationalizes a theory\-driven framework across linguistic, narrative, logical, and critical\-thinking dimensions, using repeated LLM assessments and domain\-specific logistic regression classifiers for short and long texts\. In a labelled corpus of 764 texts from social media and FakeNewsNet, FakeSpotter achieved macro F1 scores of 0\.788 for short texts and 0\.793 for long texts on a held\-out test set\. FakeSpotter's interpretive layer provides explainable outputs through feature\-based scores, signal agreement, and a caution index, and can be used for social listening\. These findings suggest that identifying the structural fingerprints of misinformation can support early, explainable, and human\-supervised assessment of potentially viral misinformation\. ## Submission history From: Federico Germani \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/d66a32bb/2609.19152)\] **\[v1\]**Mon, 20 Jul 2026 14:57:41 UTC \(2,537 KB\)
Similar Articles
SynCred-Bench: Benchmarking Synthetic Credibility in AI-Generated Visual Misinformation
Introduces SynCred-Bench, a benchmark of 600 AI-generated misinformation images across six credible-form categories, showing that existing detectors (including MLLMs, open-source AIGC detectors, and commercial APIs) perform poorly, with human annotators also struggling.
From Generation to Detection: Exploration of Discourse Driven Scenario based LLM Generated Fake News
The study examines how large language models generate and detect fake news under different scenarios, revealing variations in performance and that refined prompts do not always improve detection.
What Does 99% Accuracy Measure? A Reproducible Audit of Shortcut Learning in a Widely Used Fake News Corpus
The paper audits the widely used ISOT/Kaggle fake news corpus, revealing that high accuracy in text classifiers stems from shortcut learning via metadata and style signals rather than genuine veracity assessment.
Study (n=504): heightened suspicion did not improve detection of AI-generated text, and fake-news accuracy fell 10.2 points under sustained exposure
A study with 504 participants found that heightened suspicion did not improve detection of AI-generated text, and fake-news accuracy decreased by 10.2 points under sustained exposure, indicating cognitive fatigue in media evaluation.
Here's an AI Bullshit Detector: I use it daily and it catches things you won't see on your own
A tool called Lighthouse, built by an AI governance engineer, uses runtime validation to detect epistemic drift and confident-sounding nonsense in AI output and writing.