There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text

Simon Willison's Blog News

Summary

Sophie Alpert argues that there are no lossless transformations of natural-language text, so engineers should stand behind every idea and sentence when using AI to help write docs, and not disclaim AI-generated content.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/12/26, 08:20 AM

# There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text Source: [https://simonwillison.net/2026/Aug/11/there-are-no-lossless-transformations-of-natural-language-text/](https://simonwillison.net/2026/Aug/11/there-are-no-lossless-transformations-of-natural-language-text/) 11th August 2026 \- Link Blog **[There are no lossless transformations of natural\-language text](https://sophiebits.com/2026/06/25/there-are-no-lossless-transformations-of-natural-language-text)**\. Sophie Alpert shares her "internal policy on acceptable use of AI writing by engineers"\. It's a short read \(supporting its own recommendations\) and really good\. If you chose to have LLMs help massage your writing the following rule seems crucial to me: > **You must stand behind every idea and every sentence in your docs**\. It is your responsibility to make sure that the entire document is representative of your own thoughts before you share it\. If a reviewer asks, “What did you mean by this line?”, it’s not acceptable to reply with “Oh sorry, AI wrote that, just ignore it\.” You will confuse your readers \(and waste their time\) if you present them things that are not genuinely representative of your thoughts\. The "no lossless transformations" idea from the post title is expanded on here: > There are no lossless transformations of natural\-language text — every rewrite and rephrase changes the meaning of your writing, and if this is done by an entity that doesn’t have the most detailed mental representation of what you personally were trying to communicate, information will be lost\.

Similar Articles

There are no lossless transformations of natural-language text

Simon Willison's Blog

Simon Willison highlights Sophie Alpert's essay arguing there are no lossless transformations of natural-language text; AI-assisted rewrites can lose the author's intended meaning, so engineers must stand behind every sentence they publish.

@lagerskoy: A SINGLE GITHUB REPO JUST COLLAPSED THE “AI SOUNDS LIKE AI” PROBLEM. Most AI text fails for one reason: it’s too perfec…

X AI KOLs Timeline

A GitHub repo called Humanizer solves the 'AI sounds like AI' problem by adding sentence variation, natural pacing, and small imperfections to AI-generated text, making it indistinguishable from human writing. This tool promises to compress the editing layer into seconds, disrupting content creation workflows for SEO, newsletters, scripts, and ghostwriting.

“No AI” Statements Are Much More Than Mere Statements

Lobsters Hottest

The article argues that 'No AI' statements are necessary and useful for labeling human-made content, countering the view that such disclaimers are unnecessary. It emphasizes the difficulty of distinguishing AI-generated from human-made content, especially as AI improves.

This text was all written by AI. Can you prove it?

Reddit r/artificial

The article critiques the concept of AI-generated text and the effectiveness of watermarking for proving AI involvement, arguing that it may not capture human contribution and highlights ambiguity in defining AI slop.

Optimization Is Not All You Need

arXiv cs.AI

This essay analyzes the alignment of language models through the lens of 'optimization culture,' arguing that the focus on measurable improvement has shifted AI from exploratory engagement to administrative tedium, and that optimization procedures cannot distinguish between error and invention.