@ponnappa: talent will polarize
Summary
A commentary on how LLMs are polarizing student performance, with some relying on them to skip effort while others excel, leading to both more failures and more top grades.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 05/18/26, 04:34 PM
talent will polarize
Robert Parham (@kn_owled_ge): Teaching in the age of LLMs:
I failed 4 students, for the first time ever. I also gave more A+’s than ever before.
In previous years, students realized after the first or second HW that they weren’t in Kansas anymore and needed to work hard.
No more. Just solve it with LLMs.
Similar Articles
@patio11: This is a pretty bleak thought, but one one occasionally sees inklings of in dealing with market-leading LLMs.
A tweet highlights Robin Hanson's observation that current LLMs are being influenced by low-status clear thinkers, but may eventually learn to ignore them like high-status humans do.
Will LLMs make people less polarized?
A speculative discussion on whether widespread use of LLMs, which are compared to Wikipedia rather than rage-inducing social media algorithms, could reduce societal polarization.
Polar: A Benchmark for Evaluating Political Bias in LLMs
Polar is a 4,026-instance multiple-choice benchmark for evaluating political bias in LLMs across U.S. and South Korean political contexts, measuring bias through option-level likelihoods. Experiments on 38 LLMs show systematic bias patterns varying by political context, issue category, and presentation language.
LLM Performance on a Real, Double-Marked GCSE Benchmark
Introduces a dataset of 32,534 double-marked GCSE student responses across five subjects, finding that top-performing LLMs agree with examiners more closely than examiners agree with each other, including on handwritten and subjective tasks.
Privileged, but Biased: How PI-Conditioned Teachers Break Self-Distillation
This paper studies self-distillation with privileged information (PI) as a lone post-training objective for LLMs, reproducing reported gains on easy tasks but showing it fails on difficult reasoning tasks: per-token loss drops while validation accuracy stagnates or degrades. The authors trace the failure to PI bias, which pulls teacher targets toward a reference trajectory and trains students to be flatter and less decisive without improving reasoning.