LongDS-Bench: On the Failure of Long-Horizon Agentic Data Analysis
Summary
LongDS is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on long-horizon, multi-turn data analysis tasks derived from Kaggle notebooks; experiments show best models only achieve 48% accuracy with significant drop over long turns.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/01/26, 03:18 AM
Paper page - LongDS-Bench: On the Failure of Long-Horizon Agentic Data Analysis
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2605.30434
Abstract
LongDS benchmark evaluates agents’ ability to maintain and update analytical states over extended data analysis sessions using real-world tasks from Kaggle notebooks.
Real-world data analysis is inherently iterative, yet existing benchmarks mostly evaluate isolated or short interactive tasks, leaving agents’ ability to track evolving analytical context over long horizons untested. We introduce LongDS, a benchmark forlong-horizon,multi-turn data analysiswhere agents must maintain, update, restore, and compose evolvinganalytical states. LongDS comprises 68 tasks constructed from real-world Kaggle notebooks, spanning 2,225 turns across six domains including Geoscience, Business, and Education. Tasks are designed aroundstate-evolution patterns(e.g.,counterfactual perturbation,rollback,multi-state composition), with an average dependency span of 11.3 turns. Evaluating five state-of-the-art models, we find that the best model reaches only 48.45% average accuracy, performance drops nearly 47 points from early to late turns, andlong-horizonerrors account for 52%--69% of failures. Further analysis shows that additionalagent stepsdo not necessarily improve performance, suggesting that the key bottleneck is maintaining a correctanalytical staterather than increasinginteraction budget. We release LongDS to support research on reliablelong-horizonagentic data analysis. Code and data will be released at https://github.com/zjunlp/DataMind.
View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2605\.30434
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.30434 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.30434 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.30434 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
@Ryrenz: Google just open-sourced ARTEMIS, which lets AI hold a real Android phone and tap around like a human. The repo was only created in mid-August, and it already has 12k stars and 1,300+ forks on GitHub, running on Google Research's AndroidWorld benchmark…
Google has open-sourced ARTEMIS, enabling AI to perform natural language-driven cross-app automation testing on a real Android phone just like a human. It achieves a 99%+ task completion rate on the AndroidWorld benchmark and natively supports MCP, allowing IDEs like Claude Code, Windsurf, and Antigravity to drive devices directly.
my homegrown architecture may have just 4x'd the arc-agi 2026 milestone prizewinner
作者声称其自研的混合架构在 ARC-AGI-3 基准上取得 15.85%(29/183 关卡)的成绩,约 4 倍于 2026 里程碑获奖水平。该架构由稀疏化的 Gemma-4-31B-It 结合 OpenJEV、HRM/TRM「右半球」及双向胼胝体子系统构成,并在 QASPer LongBench 上以 62.23% KV cache 达到接近稠密模型的性能,附两篇预印本和开源仓库。
@browser_use: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 just matched Opus 5.5 on long horizon browser use. 19x cheaper > 75/100, same as Opus 5.5, alm…
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 matched Opus 5.5 on long-horizon browser use benchmarks while being 19x cheaper per task, establishing a new cost-performance Pareto frontier.
Nine models, five coding tasks, one 16GB GPU
A benchmark ran five hard self-contained coding tasks against nine models on a single 16GB RX 9060 XT GPU, grading hidden test cases, randomized oracles, and performance gates. DeepSeek-v4.1-flash and a quantized Qwen3.8-27B (kvstream fork) scored a perfect 5/5, while several other open-weight models failed on algorithmic design tasks like interval scheduling and star-pile pattern matching.
@cramforce: I benchmarked http://scriptc.dev against bun --aot scriptc is 1.6x faster than bun --aot Should you trust this benchmar…
A tweet promotes scriptc, a TypeScript-to-native compiler claiming to be 1.6x faster than bun --aot, while candidly warning that the benchmark is untrustworthy since scriptc was optimized against it. The post details scriptc's LLVM-based pipeline, coverage reports, npm package bundling, and cross-compilation to native binaries and WebAssembly.