Surveillance Is Not Safety: A statement on the UK's latest threat to privacy [pdf]
Summary
Signal publishes a statement opposing the UK's latest surveillance proposals, arguing that surveillance undermines safety and privacy.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/08/26, 09:19 PM
Similar Articles
Dontsurveil.me
Canada's Bill C-22 would require messaging apps like Signal and WhatsApp to build a backdoor for government access, undermining end-to-end encryption and threatening the privacy of all users.
The UK's Teen Social Media Ban Is Political Theater, Not Child Safety Policy
The article argues that the UK's proposed ban on teen social media use is more about political posturing than effective child safety measures.
Mozilla to UK regulators: VPNs are essential privacy and security tools
Mozilla urges UK regulators not to age-restrict VPNs, arguing they are essential privacy and security tools for all ages, and that policymakers should instead address root causes of online harm through platform accountability and digital literacy.
Canada’s Bill C-22 Is a Repackaged Version of Last Year’s Surveillance Nightmare
Canada's Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, is criticized by the EFF and tech companies as a repackaged surveillance bill that mandates metadata retention and forces encryption backdoors. Apple, Meta, and US congressional committees oppose the bill, citing significant risks to digital privacy and security.
Canada’s Bill C-22 and the security cost of collecting more data
Canada's proposed Bill C-22 (Lawful Access Act, 2026) would require electronic service providers to retain metadata and build surveillance capabilities, raising privacy and security concerns for companies and users.