Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents
Summary
This paper introduces 'progress advantage', an implicit advantage function derived from reinforcement learning post-training that enables effective step-level scoring for LLM agents without requiring dedicated reward model training. It outperforms confidence-based baselines and trained reward models across multiple benchmarks and model families.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/26/26, 10:09 PM
Paper page - Neglected Free Lunch from Post-training: Progress Advantage for LLM Agents
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.26080
Abstract
Reinforcement learning post-training enables effective step-level scoring for language models without requiring dedicated reward model training by deriving an implicit advantage function called progress advantage.
Processreward modelsenable fine-grained, step-level evaluation of LLMs, yet building them foragentic settingsremains prohibitively difficult: long-horizon interactions, irreversible actions, and stochastic environment feedback make both human annotation and Monte Carlo estimation infeasible at scale. In this work, we show thatreinforcement learning(RL) post-training already provides the ingredients for effective step-level scoring, eliminating the need for dedicated reward model training altogether. Concretely, we derive an implicit advantage under a general stochasticMarkov decision process, which we termprogress advantage--log-probability ratiobetween the RL-trained policy and its reference policy exactly recovers the optimaladvantage function. This formulation makes the resulting signal annotation-free, domain-agnostic, and available as a byproduct of the standard RL post-training pipeline. We validate the effectiveness of theprogress advantageacross three different applications:test-time scaling,uncertainty quantification, andfailure attributionon five benchmarks and four model families. Across all settings, it consistently outperforms confidence-based baselines and, despite requiring no task-specific training, surpasses dedicated trainedreward models. We complement these results with deeper analyses on characteristics ofprogress advantage, offering practical guidance for adoption in real-world agentic systems.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub2Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2606\.26080
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.26080 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.26080 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.26080 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
Retrospective Progress-Aware Self-Refinement for LLM Agent Training
This paper introduces RePro, a framework that trains LLM agents to self-generate progress signals through a forward-then-reflect rollout paradigm, achieving up to 12% absolute success rate gains on WebShop, ALFWorld, and Sokoban benchmarks.
LLMZero: Discovering Adaptive Training Strategies for RL Post-Training via LLM Agents
LLMZero uses LLM agents to search over training trajectories via tree search, discovering adaptive multi-parameter transitions for RL post-training that outperform fixed schedules and grid search across diverse tasks.
Principled Thoughts for Latent Recursive LLM Systems
The paper presents REST, a novel training objective for latent recursive LLM systems that enhances accuracy by up to 7.5 percentage points across benchmarks by incorporating properties like causality and minimality into differentiable losses.
Trains but Doesn't Learn: A Post-Training Delivery Benchmark for LLM Agents as Forward-Deployed Engineers
This paper introduces a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents as forward-deployed engineers in post-training delivery, highlighting the critical 'trains but does not learn' failure mode where models optimize without actual learning.
@ethantsliu: meta-rl induces agentic LLM exploration traditional RL trains LLM agents to use fixed policies that struggle with activ…
A new research paper reframes LLM agent training as a cross-episode Meta-RL problem, using critic-free policy gradients to enable in-context adaptation without gradient updates. The LAMER framework improves test-time performance by 11-19% over standard RL baselines on long-horizon tasks and generalizes better to unseen environments.