@TaoRay: Google's earnings actually point to a bigger macro issue. As I often say, AI's boost to productivity is linear, and the so-called explosion in total factor productivity is pure fiction. The current boom remains highly concentrated in the shovel-selling industry, and beyond driving investment, it's actually squeezing other parts of the economy — stoking inflation, pushing up raw material prices, and suppressing demand...
Summary
The author argues that Google's earnings reveal a larger macro problem: AI's boost to productivity is linear, the current boom is highly concentrated in the shovel-selling industry, and it may fuel inflation and deepen K-shaped divergence. He advises keeping position sizes in check, building up cash reserves, and treating Google as a reasonably valued cash cow to add to on pullbacks.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/29/26, 05:55 PM
Google’s earnings report actually points to larger macroeconomic issues. As I’ve often said, AI’s impact on productivity is linear — the so-called explosion in total factor productivity is pure fiction. The current boom remains highly concentrated in the shovel-selling industry. Beyond the investment-driven effects, it’s even squeezing other parts of the economy — driving inflation, pushing up raw material prices, and suppressing demand — which will deepen the K-shaped divergence. (You can already see this in the divergent performance across Google’s different business segments, and in the coming earnings season, you’ll find Google is not an outlier.)
This means we need to look at things from two angles. First, the second step in the “two phases, three steps” framework cannot be skipped. There will inevitably be macro factors that put broad pressure on the market. That’s exactly why I’ve been saying that current opportunities are all phased opportunities within the first step — “wide-range oscillation and seesaw-style trading.” You must manage position sizes, take profits when appropriate, and the overarching principle is to build up cash reserves.
But from the second angle — while Google’s earnings reflect macro issues, as a “cash cow,” it’s not expensive and will command an additional premium during the third step’s divergence phase. And precisely because, as we’ve said, the further we go, the more we’ll realize this is a macro problem and Google is not an outlier — Google as an undervalued cash cow becomes even more attractive. So a pullback in the bull market is an opportunity to add positions. Of course, the overarching principle remains maintaining overall cash levels — especially ensuring our cash position keeps growing, not shrinking.
In the “5 sector opportunities” I outlined during the last member space, the 2nd and 4th sectors have already gained around 20%. So I’ve taken partial profits on those positions and used the proceeds to add to Google.
Similar Articles
@TaoRay: My classic formulation—“two phases, three steps”—is starting to show up, one by one, in the tech giants’ earnings reports. There has been no AI-driven explosion in total factor productivity, only an investment-led, volatile boom that has instead squeezed the economy in many ways and deepened the K-shaped divergence. This proves once again that the second step cannot be skipped. Of course, there is no single line in the market that, once crossed, means everything has fully entered the second step, but…
The author analyzes recent earnings reports from tech giants using a “two phases, three steps” framework, arguing that the current AI boom is primarily driven by investment rather than a surge in total factor productivity, and will use this framework to analyze the superconductivity industry chain.
@oran_ge: https://x.com/oran_ge/status/2116337749171360048
A Chinese-language in-depth opinion piece exploring whether AI has truly created incremental value. Drawing on the recent sharp selloff in US equities (Intel down 28.6%, Google down 12.6%, Reddit down 29%) alongside rising hardware prices, collapsing token prices, and disappearing traffic, the author argues that AI is destroying value by making intelligence no longer scarce, and believes we are on the eve of an AI bubble bursting, with companies like ByteDance and Microsoft reinvesting nearly all of their profits into AI infrastructure.
@TaoRay: The recent market trend is very healthy! It also confirms my view over the past few weeks: a turning point is coming, AI development and investment have entered a new stage, where "the upstream falls, the downstream benefits," creating new room for imagination. From institutions suggesting OpenAI go public next year, to Samsung's earnings beating expectations yesterday, but the upstream saw a sharp correction while software cash cows accelerated their rise. What I predicted earlier...
The author comments that recent market trends align with their previous predictions, believing AI development has entered a new phase where the upstream corrects and the downstream software benefits, reaffirming confidence in the second-half trend.
@lifesinger: 听闻字节全面收缩在 AI 应用层的投入,应用层聚焦到豆包,硬件层押注 PICO+ AI 硬件。 原因是:烧不起,以 2025 年的投入去烧 AI 应用,字节现金流撑不过 2027 年。 巧合的是,最近还听闻有几家 ARR 过亿美元的 AI…
听闻字节全面收缩在 AI 应用层的投入,应用层聚焦到豆包,硬件层押注 PICO+ AI 硬件。 原因是:烧不起,以 2025 年的投入去烧 AI 应用,字节现金流撑不过 2027 年。 巧合的是,最近还听闻有几家 ARR 过亿美元的 AI 应用公司,开始在默默裁员,公司现金流压力非常大,很难持续。 还有一个偶然看到的新闻是,百万粉丝博主 Dan Koe 的创业产品 Eden,因烧钱太快,决定大幅裁员,产品停止迭代。 这一切都在揭示一个规律: 用互联网的思维去做 AI 产品创业,死路一条。因为 AI 产品没有规模效应,追求 DAU 等互联网时代的规模指标,会是有钱的 AI 产品存活不下去的主因。 没钱的 AI 产品创业公司,因为没钱可烧,无法追求规模,反而有机会看见真相。然后逐步赚取到真正的利润,有机会一步一步长大。 尊重经营,尊重时间。每个 AI 产品的创业者,可能都得重新审视这八个字。
@seclink: Summary: These 5 events point to a common trend—AI Agents are evolving from "technical capability" into infrastructure that requires governance, trading, management, and commercialization. Google builds control planes, agnt8x does Agent recruitment, PitchBook tracks Agent's impact on SaaS…
Summary of 5 events pointing to AI Agents transitioning from technical capabilities to infrastructure needing governance, trading, management, and commercialization, with giants like Google, Apple, OpenAI building supporting systems.