Qwen3.5 122B is the best?
Summary
A user shares their experience comparing several large language models (Qwen, Gemma) on complex tool-calling tasks, finding Qwen3.5 122B the most reliable, while criticizing smaller MoE models for instability.
Similar Articles
Gemma 4 26b a4b is genuinely the best model I have tried for language learning and scientific queries!
User reports that Gemma 4 26b outperforms Qwen 3.5/3.6 for language learning and scientific queries, despite being behind in coding tasks, and invites discussion on other non-coding use cases for small MoE models.
I tested Qwen3.6-27B, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, Qwen3.5-27B and Gemma 4 on the same real architecture-writing task on an RTX 5090
A hands-on benchmark of four local LLMs—Qwen3.6-27B, Qwen3.6-35B, Qwen3.5-27B and Gemma 4—on a 20k-token architecture-writing task shows Qwen3.6-27B delivering the best overall balance of clarity, completeness and usefulness on an RTX 5090.
@cjzafir: Qwen 3.5 4B model and 8B are too good. I fine-tuned a 4B model today and got 98% accuracy on full precision and Q8 quan…
A developer reports achieving high accuracy with fine-tuned Qwen 3.5 4B and 8B models using Unsloth, suggesting a shift towards specialized Expert Language Models (ELMs) for niche tasks.
Is Qwen3.6 current king for local agentic use?
A user reports that Qwen3.6 35B A3B outperforms other local models like Gemma4 and GLM 4.7 Flash REAP for agentic tasks, though occasional loops still occur.
Qwen 35b a3b surprises me
User reports positive experience with Qwen 35b a3b for agentic coding tasks, noting it outperforms Gemma4 26b in their use case and works well for demo/data analytics, especially in agentic mode versus chat.