What speed is everyone getting on Qwen3.6 27b?

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA Tools

Summary

User benchmarks Qwen3.6-27B-Q8_0 at ~13 tokens/sec on 3 mixed GPUs with 128k context via llama.cpp, asking if performance is typical.

I'm getting \~13 tps on Q8\_0, with a context window of 128000, K Q8\_0, V Q8\_0 this is on 3x GPUS (1x2060super 8gb, 2x5060ti 16gb), via llamacpp unsure if this is slow or to be expected? \*/llama-server --port 8080 --model \*/llama.cpp/Qwen3.6-27B-Q8\_0/Qwen3.6-27B-Q8\_0.gguf -mm \*/Qwen3.6-27B-Q8\_0/mmproj-BF16.gguf -np 1 --temperature 1.0 --top-p 0.95 --top-k 20 --min-p 0.0 --presence-penalty 1.5 --repeat-penalty 1.0 --chat-template-kwargs '{"preserve\_thinking": true}' --cache-type-k q8\_0 --cache-type-v q8\_0 -c 128000 --fit-target 1536 (--fit-target 1536 was to allow some space for the vision capability to work)
Original Article

Similar Articles

Qwen 3.8 27B is faster than expected

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

A user reports that the Qwen 3.8 27B model achieves 50-60 tokens per second on dual 5060 TI cards, showing unexpected speed improvements over previous versions like Qwen 3.6.

Running Qwen3.6 35b a3b on 8gb vram and 32gb ram ~190k context

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

The author shares a high-performance local inference configuration for running Qwen3.6 35B A3B on limited hardware (8GB VRAM, 32GB RAM) using a modified llama.cpp with TurboQuant support, achieving ~37-51 tok/sec with ~190k context.

Qwen 3.6 benchmarks on 2x RTX PRO 6000

Reddit r/LocalLLaMA

Benchmarks for Qwen 3.6 27B and 35B models on dual RTX PRO 6000 GPUs using VLLM, showing generation throughput up to 3500 tokens per second.