StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows
Summary
StartupBench introduces a benchmark for evaluating general-purpose AI agents on real-world startup workflows, revealing that top models complete only about 30% of tasks due to gaps in complex instruction following and domain-specific expertise.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 08/19/26, 03:58 AM
Paper page - StartupBench: Benchmarking General-Purpose Agents on Market-Validated End-to-End Workflows
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.17800 Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
StartupBench evaluates end-to-end AI agents on real-world startup workflows and reveals that even top models complete only about 30% of tasks, highlighting gaps in instruction following and domain expertise.
Recent advances inLarge Language Models(LLMs) andagentshave substantially improved the ability of AI systems to execute complex tasks. Yet existing benchmarks largely rely on researcher-selected tasks, leaving uncertain whether such progress extends to the work that real-world users actually demand from AI systems. We introduceStartupBench, anE2E agent benchmarkgrounded in market-validated AI startup products. Rather than defining tasks from pre-defined assumptions about useful agent capabilities, we systematically study AI products with demonstrated adoption, together with their product workflows and users, to identify real-world tasks for which AI has established practical demand across diverse professional domains. We translate these workflows into complete deliverable-oriented tasks and evaluate them with fine-grained rubrics capturing their complex requirements. Across representative models evaluated under a unifiedagent harness, even the strongest model successfully completes only approximately 30\% ofStartupBench, despite making substantial partial progress on many tasks. Further analysis identifies aspects likecomplex instruction followinganddomain-specific expertiseas major sources of failure. Our results reveal that many market-validated workflows remain beyond the reliable capabilities of current general-purposeagents, establishingStartupBenchas an empirical measure of progress toward E2E completions of real-world user tasks.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageAdd to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608\.17800
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper0
No model linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.17800 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Datasets citing this paper0
No dataset linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.17800 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Spaces citing this paper0
No Space linking this paper
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.17800 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
DSAgentBench: Can Agents Automate End-to-End Data-Science Workflows in Real Computer Environments?
This paper introduces DSAgentBench, the first benchmark for evaluating autonomous agents on complete, multi-tool data-science workflows in real computer environments. Results show that even the strongest agent (Claude-4.6-Sonnet) achieves only 56.70% task success, while open-source agents remain below 1%, revealing a substantial capability gap.
SaaS-Bench: Can Computer-Use Agents Leverage Real-World SaaS to Solve Professional Workflows?
SaaS-Bench is a new benchmark built on 23 deployable SaaS systems across six professional domains, containing 106 long-horizon tasks for evaluating computer-using agents. Experiments show that even the strongest models complete fewer than 4% of tasks end-to-end, highlighting significant limitations in current agent capabilities.
HealthAgentBench: A Unified Benchmark Suite of Realistic Agentic Healthcare Environments for Challenging Frontier AI Agents
This paper introduces HealthAgentBench, a suite of 54 realistic healthcare tasks for evaluating frontier AI agents. It finds that even the best agent (Codex GPT-5.5) achieves only ~42% success, highlighting substantial room for improvement.
WorkBench Revisited: Workplace Agents Two Years On
This paper revisits the WorkBench benchmark for workplace agents two years after its initial release, showing that the best agent (Claude Opus 4.8) now completes 89% of tasks with only 2.5% harmful side effects, compared to GPT-4's 43% completion and 26% harm rate in 2024. It finds that capability and safety improve together, open-weight models have drastically lowered costs, and some basic mistakes persist.
JobBench: Aligning Agent Work With Human Will
JobBench is a benchmark built from worker surveys to evaluate AI agents on tasks that workers most want automated, covering 130 tasks across 35 professions with detailed rubrics.