ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers
benchmark tool-use agents reasoning evaluation

Summary

Introduces ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark that removes semantic cues to test whether agents can autonomously discover tool behaviors through trial-and-error, revealing that language models struggle to adapt to structural changes and fall back on exhaustive search.

To operate robustly in open-world environments, autonomous agents should be able to infer the behavior of unfamiliar systems through interaction alone, even in the absence of documentation. However, existing tool-use benchmarks expose semantic tool schemas in static environments, allowing agents to rely on prior knowledge rather than autonomous discovery. To address this limitation, we introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning. By removing semantic cues and enforcing a continuous task curriculum, the benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction. The benchmark further introduces dynamic challenges, including mapping drift, stochastic action failures, and temporal execution windows, to evaluate whether agents can revise and adapt their hypotheses as the environment changes. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation. When faced with structural changes such as mapping drift, agents fail to use deductive strategies such as cycle tracing, and instead exhibit belief inertia or fall back to exhaustive search. Increasing test-time reasoning only amplifies this expensive brute-force search rather than enabling deductive recovery. While equipping agents with persistent memory reduces compounding errors, they remain unable to efficiently infer structural changes, highlighting a gap in current agent reasoning.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/04/26, 05:37 AM

Paper page - ScrambleToolBench: Agents Search Exhaustively Even When Their Own Map Points to the Next Step

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.02358

Abstract

Tooperaterobustlyinopen-worldenvironments,autonomousagentsshouldbeabletoinferthebehaviorofunfamiliarsystemsthroughinteractionalone,evenintheabsenceofdocumentation.However,existingtool-usebenchmarksexposesemantictoolschemasinstaticenvironments,allowingagentstorelyonpriorknowledgeratherthanautonomousdiscovery.Toaddressthislimitation,weintroduceScrambleToolBench,aninteractiveterminalbenchmarkdesignedtoisolatebehavioralreasoning.Byremovingsemanticcuesandenforcingacontinuoustaskcurriculum,thebenchmarkrequiresagentstouncoverhiddentoolbehaviorsentirelythroughtrial-and-errorinteraction.Thebenchmarkfurtherintroducesdynamicchallenges,includingmappingdrift,stochasticactionfailures,andtemporalexecutionwindows,toevaluatewhetheragentscanreviseandadapttheirhypothesesastheenvironmentchanges.Ourevaluationofstate-of-the-artlanguagemodelsrevealsthatsuccessfulinitialdiscoverydoesnottranslateintorobustadaptation.Whenfacedwithstructuralchangessuchasmappingdrift,agentsfailtousedeductivestrategiessuchascycletracing,andinsteadexhibitbeliefinertiaorfallbacktoexhaustivesearch.Increasingtest-timereasoningonlyamplifiesthisexpensivebrute-forcesearchratherthanenablingdeductiverecovery.Whileequippingagentswithpersistentmemoryreducescompoundingerrors,theyremainunabletoefficientlyinferstructuralchanges,highlightingagapincurrentagentreasoning.

View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub0Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608\.02358

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.02358 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.02358 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.02358 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

The Amazing Agent Race: Strong Tool Users, Weak Navigators

arXiv cs.CL

The Amazing Agent Race (AAR) introduces a new benchmark with 1,400 directed acyclic graph (DAG) puzzle instances to evaluate LLM agents on fork-merge tool chains and Wikipedia navigation. Evaluations reveal agents excel at tool-use (errors <17%) but struggle with navigation (27-52% of failures), exposing a critical gap invisible to existing linear benchmarks.

A Matter of TASTE: Improving Coverage and Difficulty of Agent Benchmarks

Hugging Face Daily Papers

TASTE is an automated method for generating challenging agent benchmarks with broader tool-use coverage by evolving tool sequences through adaptive contrastive n-gram modeling and iterative difficulty refinement. The resulting τ^c-Bench reveals that models nearly saturating existing benchmarks suffer severe performance drops, indicating saturation rather than robust skill.