@Necokeine: If you're not in the MaaS business, you might not be aware — DeepSeek's open-source DeepInfer is actually a framework that's been very deeply customized for DeepSeek 4.1F. For example, DeepInfer's task scheduling doesn't consider VRAM capacity at all. Why? Because DS 4.1F's KV cache is extremely optimized…
Summary
The discussion points out that DeepSeek's open-source DeepInfer is an inference framework deeply customized for DeepSeek 4.1F. Its KV cache is extremely optimized at just 890 bytes per token, meaning task scheduling never needs to account for VRAM capacity. In contrast, the Kimi series models have KV cache overhead 15–30x higher, resulting in poor inference performance and user experience.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/28/26, 05:38 PM
For those not working in MaaS, they might not be aware — but DeepSeek’s open-source DeepInfer is actually deeply customized specifically for DeepSeek 4.1F. For example, DeepInfer’s task scheduling completely ignores VRAM capacity. Why? Because DS 4.1F’s KV cache is extremely optimized — it only requires 890 bytes per token. That means even a full 1M-token context only needs 890MB, less than 1GB of VRAM. That’s virtually impossible with other models — even DS 4F needs four times that amount. Thanks to such a small KV cache, DeepInfer can completely disregard VRAM constraints and simply limit batch size.
Setting aside the enormous model size and the various headaches caused by Kimi K3.1’s massive number of activated parameters — back in the K3 era, each token required 27kB under bf16, roughly 30x the overhead, and even with FP8 it was still 15x. Combined with Kimi’s emphasis on long-context capabilities, this huge KV cache difference makes inference work extremely difficult to implement.
Yunchen Cyan (@CyanCloud77): Can’t Kimi even copy DeepSeek’s inference framework?
Kimi’s problem is that their infra is terrible — meaning inference performance is terrible.
This causes subscription users’ quotas to deplete at lightning speed, yet they keep making all sorts of marketing noise.
It’s clearly a very strong model 😑😑😑
Similar Articles
@jakevin7: Were it not for DeepSeek, the ages would be an endless night. DeepSeek has fully open-sourced DeepInfer, its internal inference framework used to run production services. This is the high-performance inference engine they use to power the DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model, focused on high throughput and low latency.
DeepSeek has fully open-sourced DeepInfer, its internal production-grade inference framework used to power the DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model, emphasizing high throughput and low latency. They also open-sourced the deepseek-recipe component to ensure community deployments behave consistently with the official API.
DeepInfer: High-performance inference framework for DeepSeek models
DeepSeek open-sources DeepInfer, the high-performance inference framework powering its large-scale production services, featuring optimized kernels, MoE expert parallelism, speculative decoding, batch-invariant inference, and support for NVIDIA SM100 GPUs and Huawei Ascend 950 NPUs.
@_avichawla: DeepSeek did it again! They just open-sourced DeepInfer, the inference stack behind cache hits that return the first to…
DeepSeek open-sourced DeepInfer, its inference stack that reuses KV cache from SSDs via 3FS to deliver first tokens up to 26x faster, enabled by MLA's 93% KV cache compression.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: Large-Scale Inference Deployment (15 minute read)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 的大规模推理部署文章,介绍 DeepInfer 结合分布式推理、缓存、负载均衡与投机解码提升效率,DeepSeek 单集群日处理 155 万亿 token,每 GPU 小时收入 38 美元,并开源了大部分推理框架。
@karminski3: Magic! DeepSeekV4 context memory compressed to 1/10! Everyone knows DeepSeekV4 supports 1M context and is heavily optimized. To actually use 1M context, VRAM usage is only about 10GB (compared to DeepSeek-V3.2 which needs about…
FlashMemory-DeepSeek-V4 proposes a novel inference paradigm called Lookahead Sparse Attention (LSA), which uses a neural memory indexer to actively predict future context needs, compressing physical KV cache usage to 13.5% of full context baseline while improving average accuracy by 0.6%. This method adopts a decoupled training strategy that allows independent training of the indexer without loading the base model, significantly reducing training cost.