Man jailed for posting Trump meme wins $835,000 settlement

Ars Technica News

Summary

Larry Bushart, who was jailed for posting a Trump meme, wins an $835,000 settlement from the sheriff who arrested him in retaliation for protected speech.

<p>Larry Bushart, a retired Tennessee cop who was <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/10/man-finally-released-a-month-after-absurd-arrest-for-reposting-trump-meme/">jailed for 37 days for posting a Trump meme on Facebook</a>, won an $835,000 settlement Wednesday after <a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/12/man-sues-cops-who-jailed-him-for-37-days-for-trolling-a-charlie-kirk-vigil/">suing the county and sheriff</a> that he said jailed him in order to censor him.</p> <p>In a <a href="https://www.fire.org/news/victory-tennessee-man-jailed-37-days-trump-meme-wins-835000-settlement-after-first-amendment">press release</a>, Bushart's legal team at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) confirmed that Bushart agreed to dismiss his lawsuit in exchange for the "substantial settlement."</p> <p>"I am pleased my First Amendment rights have been vindicated," Bushart said. "The people’s freedom to participate in civil discourse is crucial to a healthy democracy. I am looking forward to moving on and spending time with my family."</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/man-wins-835k-after-sheriff-jailed-him-for-a-month-over-charlie-kirk-post/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/man-wins-835k-after-sheriff-jailed-him-for-a-month-over-charlie-kirk-post/#comments">Comments</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 05/20/26, 05:27 PM

# Man jailed for posting Trump meme wins $835,000 settlement Source: [https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/man-wins-835k-after-sheriff-jailed-him-for-a-month-over-charlie-kirk-post/](https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/05/man-wins-835k-after-sheriff-jailed-him-for-a-month-over-charlie-kirk-post/) Seemingly, Weems hoped the threat of arrest would pressure Bushart into removing the post, but Bushart refused to be censored\. [Video](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/GWCOvcS7aQw)from the arrest shows that Bushart told the arresting officer he never made such a threat, and some cops at the jail seemed similarly confused about the basis of his arrest\. In one exchange caught on footage[reviewed by The Intercept](https://theintercept.com/2025/10/30/larry-bushart-tennessee-free-speech-charlie-kirk-meme/), Bushart even shared a laugh with an officer over how silly his arrest seemed to be: “Just to clarify, this is what they charged you with—Threatening Mass Violence at a School,” a Perry County jail officer told Bushart\. “At a school?” Bushart asked\. “I ain’t got a clue,” the officer responded, laughing\. “I just gotta do what I have to do\.” “I’ve been in Facebook jail, but now I’m really in it,” Bushart said, joining him in laughing\. Weems later admitted that “he knew at the time of the arrest that Larry’s Facebook post was a pre\-existing meme that referred to an actual shooting that took place in a different state, over 500 miles away,” FIRE said\. But he arrested Bushart anyway, violating Bushart’s “constitutional rights in retaliation for his protected speech,” FIRE said\. FIRE noted that Bushart is one of 600 people that[Reuters found](https://www.reuters.com/investigations/charlie-kirk-purge-how-600-americans-were-punished-pro-trump-crackdown-2025-11-19/)were punished for making controversial online statements about Kirk’s death, following a government\-backed campaign targeting political speech\. Bushart’s win shows that the First Amendment can stand up to censorship attempts, FIRE staff attorney Cary Davis suggested\. “It’s in times of turmoil and heightened tensions that our national commitment to free speech is tested the most,” Davis said\. “When government officials fail that test, the Constitution exists to hold them accountable\. Our hope is that Larry’s settlement sends a message to law enforcement across the country: Respect the First Amendment today, or be prepared to pay the price tomorrow\.”

Similar Articles

Judge weighs if Trump can charge $100K for early access to Truth Social posts

Ars Technica

A federal judge is weighing whether Donald Trump can charge up to $100,000 per month for early API access to Truth Social posts that often break government news, with DOJ defending the scheme and news groups arguing it violates the First Amendment, Presidential Records Act, and Fifth Amendment.