Training a harness for model-agnostic and task-environment-agnostic capability improvements with PyTorch-like framework [P]
Summary
Introduces a framework for training a harness to improve task LLM capabilities in a model-agnostic and task-environment-agnostic way, with results on Terminal Bench and SWE-Bench.
Similar Articles
Self-Harness: Harnesses That Improve Themselves
Self-Harness introduces a new paradigm where LLM-based agents iteratively improve their own operating harness by mining model-specific weaknesses, proposing harness modifications, and validating them through regression testing, achieving substantial performance gains on Terminal-Bench-2.0 across multiple base models.
@omarsar0: // Self-Harness: Harnesses That Improve Themselves // (bookmark this one) Most of the agent scaffolds we rely on today …
This paper introduces Self-Harness, a new paradigm where LLM-based agents iteratively improve their own operating harness—prompts, tools, and control flow—without human engineers or stronger external agents, achieving significant performance gains across multiple models.
@lateinteraction: The "harness" is starting to blur with the neural architecture, in terms of who carries the inductive biases that unloc…
Researchers propose that the harness (training setup) should carry inductive biases for generalization, showing that training RLMs is far superior to vanilla Transformers for scaling and generalization to harder tasks.
Harnesses for Inference-Time Alignment over Execution Trajectories
This paper studies harness design for LLM agents, separating it into task decomposition and guided execution, and shows that more elaborate harnesses are not uniformly better; it reveals failure modes and proposes partial harnesses as effective.
It's Not the Capability: Harness Sensitivity Is Non-Monotone Across LLM Agent Tiers
This paper empirically tests the common assumption that more structured harnesses universally improve LLM agent reliability, finding a non-monotone relationship across model tiers. It introduces the HEAT-24 benchmark and reveals that strict harnesses can harm frontier chat models while benefiting reasoning models.