Congresswoman denies staff used AI to write defense funding amendment

The Verge News

Summary

US Rep. Anna Paulina Luna denies staff used AI to draft bill text after a screenshot showed a Claude reference in an amendment summary, though she admits AI was used for spellcheck.

<figure> <img alt="Image of US Congress" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/STK481_STK432_CONGRESS_GOVERNMENT_CIVRGINIA_C.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" /> <figcaption> </figcaption> </figure> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) says her staff used AI for "spellcheck" in an amendment summary for a major defense bill, but denies it was used for the bill text itself and says "NO Legislation is ever drafted with AI."</p> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">Luna issued the response after accounts on X <a href="https://x.com/RepLuna/status/2069848227398963384">began sharing screenshots</a> of an amendment summary for the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. It reads: "Identical to H.R. 100 (118th Congress).11:25 AM????Claude responded: Requires the Secretary of Defense to designate Department of Defense activities, support, and operations at the southwest land border as a named operation with…"</p> <img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/06/ai-bill-luna.png?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,6.1935248525236,100,86.251039296683" alt="" title="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;em&gt;Luna" data-portal-copyright="Screenshot: The Verge &lt;a href=&quot;https://x.com/RepLuna/status/2069848227398963384?s=20&quot;&gt;via X&lt;/a&gt;"> <p class="wp-block-paragraph">At first, Luna's response seemingly indic …</p> <p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/956394/florida-anna-paulina-luna-anthropic-claude">Read the full story at The Verge.</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/24/26, 07:53 PM

# Congresswoman denies staff used AI to write defense funding amendment Source: [https://www.theverge.com/policy/956394/florida-anna-paulina-luna-anthropic-claude](https://www.theverge.com/policy/956394/florida-anna-paulina-luna-anthropic-claude) [![Emma Roth](https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/author_profile_images/195810/EMMA_ROTH.0.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C0%2C100%2C100&w=96)](https://www.theverge.com/authors/emma-roth) Emma Roth is a news writer who covers the streaming wars, consumer tech, crypto, social media, and much more\. Previously, she was a writer and editor at MUO\. Rep\. Anna Paulina Luna \(R\-FL\) says her staff used AI for “spellcheck” in an amendment summary for a major defense bill, but denies it was used for the bill text itself and says “NO Legislation is ever drafted with AI\.” Luna issued the response after accounts on X[began sharing screenshots](https://x.com/RepLuna/status/2069848227398963384)of an amendment summary for the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act\. It reads: “Identical to H\.R\. 100 \(118th Congress\)\.11:25 AM????Claude responded: Requires the Secretary of Defense to designate Department of Defense activities, support, and operations at the southwest land border as a named operation with…” [![Luna’s edited response.](https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/06/ai-bill-luna.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0%2C6.1935248525236%2C100%2C86.251039296683&w=2400)](https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/06/ai-bill-luna.png?quality=90&strip=all&crop=0,6.1935248525236,100,86.251039296683) At first, Luna’s response seemingly indicated Claude had been used for amendment text\. Her post said that “staff used AI to correct a draft text and didn’t edit\.” Luna added: “Not a shocker\. Most staff use it\. I have told them to make sure they are double checking and more thorough\.” After users on X began speculating that her staff is using the technology to write bills, Luna[edited her response](https://x.com/RepLuna/status/2069848227398963384?s=20): “Yeah my staff used AI to spell/grammar check the amendment SUMMARY, not the actual amendment text itself,” her post now reads\. She followed[it up with another](https://x.com/RepLuna/status/2069842990642733421?s=20): “FYI NO Legislation is ever drafted with AI\. All bill text from the House comes from the House Legislative Council which is prohibited from using AI\. The screenshot you’re referencing is an AI summary of the bill that’s also used for spellcheck, cmon man 🤣”\. As AI tools become more common in workplaces, so are references to the AI chatbots in places where they shouldn’t be\. Over the past few years,[judges have caught lawyers](https://www.theverge.com/news/666443/judge-slams-lawyers-ai-bogus-research)using AI chatbots to draft legal filings[filled with fake citations](https://www.theverge.com/policy/677373/lawyers-chatgpt-hallucinations-ai)\. Lawmakers around the globe are turning to the technology as well, with city officials in Brazil[unknowingly approving an ordinance](https://apnews.com/article/brazil-artificial-intelligence-porto-alegre-5afd1240afe7b6ac202bb0bbc45e08d4)written with ChatGPT\. Arizona state representative Alexander Kolodin has also told[*The Verge*that he’s used ChatGPT to write state\-level legislation](https://www.theverge.com/policy/677373/lawyers-chatgpt-hallucinations-ai)\. **Follow topics and authors**from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates\. - Emma Roth

Similar Articles

Congress’s favorite AI tool? ChatGPT

TechCrunch AI

Congress has spent roughly $100,580 on ChatGPT across 798 transactions, making OpenAI's tool the dominant AI vendor for House offices, with Anthropic's Claude trailing; staffers use these tools for writing memos, analyzing legislation, and constituent services.

Quoting New York Times Editors’ Note

Simon Willison's Blog

The New York Times issued a correction after discovering an AI tool generated a false quote attributed to Canadian politician Pierre Poilievre, highlighting the risks of relying on AI for news reporting.