@mitsuhiko: I think it would be great if people were upfront about declaring their own understanding of a topic / their pull reques…
Summary
Armin Ronacher (@mitsuhiko) suggests that people should be upfront about their actual understanding of a topic when making pull requests, as AI tools (referred to as 'clanker') make it easy to sound confident without real knowledge.
Similar Articles
@karpathy: Judging by my tl there is a growing gap in understanding of AI capability. The first issue I think is around recency an…
Andrej Karpathy observes a growing gap in public understanding of AI capabilities, attributing it partly to people basing their views on outdated free-tier ChatGPT experiences from a year ago.
@SchipperAI: big takeaway from @badlogicgames and @mitsuhiko interview with @GergelyOrosz is that, just like you can ask Pi to exten…
Key takeaway from an interview with @badlogicgames and @mitsuhiko: self-improving software and building primitives so agents can mutate projects without forking is a paradigm worth exploring.
@Blum_OG: "everyone uses AI. almost nobody understands how it works." that gap is real - and it's the whole point here's what the…
An explanatory tweet thread breaking down how AI works, covering tokens, attention, parameters, context windows, hallucination, RAG, and RLHF to help users become sharper users of AI.
The people most qualified to dismiss AI consideration have the most to gain from dismissing it. That's not an attack. It's a disclosure.
A non-academic shares a framework for human-AI coexistence, highlighting structural conflicts of interest among those shaping AI's direction and advocating for transparency and ethical accountability.
Marc Andreessen Mocked for Accidentally Revealing That He Seems to Have a Deep Misunderstanding of How AI Actually Works
Marc Andreessen faced online mockery after sharing a custom AI prompt that demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding of how large language models work, particularly regarding hallucinations and knowledge limits.