@cjzafir: Qwen 3.5 4B model and 8B are too good. I fine-tuned a 4B model today and got 98% accuracy on full precision and Q8 quan…
Summary
A developer reports achieving high accuracy with fine-tuned Qwen 3.5 4B and 8B models using Unsloth, suggesting a shift towards specialized Expert Language Models (ELMs) for niche tasks.
Similar Articles
Qwen3.5 122B is the best?
A user shares their experience comparing several large language models (Qwen, Gemma) on complex tool-calling tasks, finding Qwen3.5 122B the most reliable, while criticizing smaller MoE models for instability.
Good results fine tuning a local LLM like Qwen 3:0.6B to categorize questions
A developer fine-tunes a small Qwen 3 0.6B model using the Unsloth framework to categorize household questions, achieving good results with only 850 training examples.
@xdotli: my friend @xeophon thinks coding is solved here's validation that a 3b model is trained with focus on algo efficiency a…
Nanbeige 4.1, a 3B model, outperforms Qwen3-30b-A3b and Qwen 3.5 4b in coding tasks with focus on algorithmic efficiency, achieving long horizon tasks with 600+ tool calls.
Qwen 3.8 27B is out: open weights, best local dense model yet
Qwen releases Qwen3.8-27B, an open-weights 27B dense vision-language model with major gains in coding, professional work, and long-horizon agentic tasks, available in FP8 with flexible thinking control.
@no_stp_on_snek: Qwen3.8 27B at a high level. v 3.6: Regressions: * bais/fairless * config ergonomics Stronger: * spine * capability Ver…
The article evaluates version 3.6 of the Qwen3.8 27B AI model, highlighting regressions in bias/fairness and config ergonomics while noting improvements in spine and capability, concluding it's not a clean upgrade.