I compared all specs of the major GPUs/machines that are being used here, because bandwidth is not everything. Some of ya'll need a reality check.
Summary
The author compares various GPUs for LLM inference, critiquing common benchmarks and emphasizing the importance of prefill performance over generation speed, offering recommendations for different budgets and use cases.
Similar Articles
Benchmarking 15 "E-Waste" GPUs with Modern Workloads
Benchmarking 15 decommissioned NVIDIA Tesla GPUs (K80, P100, V100) for modern AI workloads, showing their viability and cost-effectiveness for homelab inference setups.
Comparing dual-GPU inference speed between llama.cpp row/tensor split and ik_llama graph split
A user benchmarks dual-GPU inference speed on two RTX 3080 20GB using llama.cpp (row/tensor split) and ik_llama (graph split) with a Qwen3.6-27B GGUF model, comparing token generation and prompt processing speeds.
Buy recommendations on a thight Budget to aid my RX 6800
This post discusses budget GPU options (Radeon VII vs two P100s) for LLM inference with an RX 6800, focusing on VRAM vs speed tradeoffs for MoE models.
Ran the same models across Strix Halo, RTX 3090, and RTX 5070 because I wanted my own numbers
The author ran 55 inference benchmark runs across Strix Halo, RTX 3090, and RTX 5070 with multiple backends, revealing that memory bandwidth dominates decode speed, the RTX 5070 beats the 3090 on small models, and reasoning models appear ~5x slower due to hidden reasoning content.
Memory Bandwidth for Local AI Hardware (2026 Edition)
The article breaks down memory bandwidth as the critical metric for local AI hardware performance, comparing current GPUs and unified memory systems from NVIDIA, Apple, AMD, Intel, and others across different performance tiers.