Google Earth briefly released an AI feature for creating fake satellite images, then quickly retracted it over concerns it could undermine trust in genuine satellite imagery and enable misinformation. Experts question whether Google's SynthID watermarking is sufficient to prevent abuse.
<p>Google briefly allowed anyone to create AI-modified versions of satellite imagery available in Google Earth—before quickly reversing its decision as people shared examples of AI-generated pictures that illustrated the potential for misinformation and disinformation.</p>
<p>There is no shortage of generative AI tools that already allow people to create AI-modified images of real buildings and cities based on user prompts. But Google’s aborted attempt to incorporate its Nano Banana 2 AI image generator as a Google Earth feature made it even easier for anyone to create modified versions of authentic imagery depicting real locations—something that Google boasted about when initially promoting the new feature.</p>
<p>“For the first time, you can generate custom images using Google Earth’s satellite, aerial, and 3D imagery alongside Nano Banana, which creates concepts grounded in the real world,” wrote Bryan Horowitz, product manager for Google Earth, in a <a href="https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/earth/nano-banana-google-earth-image-generation/">company blog post</a> on July 30.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/07/google-earth-releases-swiftly-retracts-ai-feature-to-make-fake-satellite-images/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/07/google-earth-releases-swiftly-retracts-ai-feature-to-make-fake-satellite-images/#comments">Comments</a></p>
# Google Earth risked ruin with retracted AI tool for making fake satellite pics
Source: [https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/07/google-earth-releases-swiftly-retracts-ai-feature-to-make-fake-satellite-images/](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/07/google-earth-releases-swiftly-retracts-ai-feature-to-make-fake-satellite-images/)
[Previous Ars testing of Google’s SynthID system](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/07/tested-google-synthid-works-great-but-labeling-ai-content-may-be-a-losing-game/)has shown that Google’s digital watermark can persist despite substantial image edits and data loss\. However, Ars also encountered the issue of SynthID limiting image checks to about 10 per day\.
When Ars prompted Google’s Gemini app to run a SynthID check on several AI\-modified images generated within Google Earth—before Google removed the Google Earth feature—Gemini responded that it had “detected digital watermarking indicating that part or all of this image was generated or edited using Google AI tools\.”
But Ess questioned why Google’s policy on preventing the creation of AI\-generated images on harmful topics had not stopped him from depicting scenes such as a hospital with a bomb crater in Gaza\. He also expressed skepticism about primarily relying on Google’s SynthID watermarking system and Google’s AI tools for verifying whether an image is AI\-generated\.
“Fakes do not travel as clean files with their credentials intact,” Ess wrote\. “They travel as screen recordings, re\-encodes, screenshots of screenshots, filmed off somebody’s phone in a hurry\.”
Indeed, Google’s SynthID was unable to provide any image verification when Ars used a smartphone camera to take a photo of an AI\-altered image made using the Google Earth feature\.
## Undermining trust
By introducing an AI image generator as a Google Earth feature, Google risked undermining public trust in Google Earth as a reliable reference for providing authentic imagery of the real world, Ess said\. It could have also handed an additional excuse to government officials or anyone who wants to deny genuine satellite photos by claiming they were modified or generated entirely by AI tools\.
Giving anyone access to an easy tool to create AI\-modified satellite imagery could have also made it even harder for journalists and researchers checking misinformation and disinformation\. Ess recommended using multiple sources to verify satellite imagery and relying on constantly updated satellite imagery sources such as[Europe’s Copernicus Sentinel\-2](https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/07/european-union-grants-us-request-to-restrict-satellite-images-of-iran-war-region/)\.
Google may have alleviated immediate concerns by deciding to quickly remove the AI tool within Google Earth—but its statement suggested that the company could eventually bring the feature back in the future\.
“We’ve seen geospatial professionals using this feature for a range of useful purposes, however we’ve also seen people sharing screenshots of generated imagery that appear to violate our policies,” according to the Google statement\. “So we’re rolling back this feature in Google Earth while we work on implementing stronger guardrails\.”
Google Earth's new AI image generator (Nano Banana) can create realistic altered satellite and aerial images, raising concerns about misinformation despite SynthID watermarks. After Digital Digging demonstrated believable fakes, Google announced it is rolling back the feature.
Google pulled its Google Earth AI image generation feature just one day after launch, after critics warned it could be abused to create and spread geospatial misinformation. The company said it is rolling the feature back while it works on stronger guardrails.
Google shut down its Google Earth AI image generation feature just one day after launch, citing policy violations and deepfake concerns, while promising stronger guardrails before any future reintroduction.
Security researcher details how Google’s SynthID invisible watermark for AI-generated images can be reversed, undermining media-provenance claims and highlighting fundamental flaws in proprietary watermarking schemes.
Google's SynthID watermark is robust against degradation but cannot fully solve AI misinformation; the article tests its durability and discusses the limitations of watermarking and metadata approaches.