Protests against OpenAI are becoming more creative, with artists using Titanic-themed art to criticize the company. Additionally, OpenAI faces safety halts in AI training, unauthorized data access, and legal challenges from Florida.
<p>Two artists from a Bay Area studio unveiled <em>What Iceberg?</em>, a table-sized installation placed at the public entrance to an OpenAI developer event in San Francisco on Tuesday.</p>
<p>According to a description of the piece, the 5-foot-tall sculpture "shows OpenAI's leaders and investors escaping a sinking ship with unimaginable wealth, while everyone else is left to face the cost of AI.”</p>
<p>One of the co-creators of the piece, a man in his “late 30s” who gave his name as “Kevin,” said that he and members of the Berkeley-based Odd Friend Studio spent the last five days working to build <em>What Iceberg?</em> out of papier mâché, cardboard, paint—and a repurposed table.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/09/what-iceberg-bay-area-artists-target-openai-with-titanic-themed-protest-art/">Read full article</a></p>
<p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/09/what-iceberg-bay-area-artists-target-openai-with-titanic-themed-protest-art/#comments">Comments</a></p>
# Protests against OpenAI get increasingly creative
Source: [https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/09/what-iceberg-bay-area-artists-target-openai-with-titanic-themed-protest-art/](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/09/what-iceberg-bay-area-artists-target-openai-with-titanic-themed-protest-art/)
“The cost here is time,” he said\. “Doing everything by hand, creating the structure, taking as few shortcuts as possible, and doing this in a really quick time period is a lot of the real cost\. In so many ways, that is the cost of art\. Good art and intentional art—stuff that makes sense and craftsmanship—that’s a function of time\.
“Creativity is our birthright, and when someone sells you a shortcut to escape that—that’s insane to me\. In some ways, it is the antithesis of a lot of bad algorithmically generated art\. Maybe people will tell us it’s bad art? Who cares\! Making and creating is something that AI claims that it does, but it doesn’t\.”
OpenAI, as one of the world’s largest AI companies, has been the target of numerous other protests in recent months and years\. Last week, for instance, people[protested](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/24/climate-protesters-ai)against OpenAI at its New York City offices\.
On Monday, training for OpenAI’s latest model, GPT\-6\.1 Astra,[was stopped over safety concerns](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/09/openai-halts-frontier-model-training-amid-string-of-agent-misalignment-incidents/)\. Also on Monday, the company[apologized](https://openai.com/index/how-we-will-do-better-for-australia/)for accessing Australian government websites “in ways that we were not authorized to\.” Meanwhile, the[state of Florida asked a court to halt OpenAI’s development](https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/09/florida-asks-court-to-put-the-brakes-on-openais-frontier-ai-development/), calling it an “unacceptably risky product\.”
OpenAI did not immediately respond to Ars’ request for comment on Tuesday morning\.
Protesters gathered at OpenAI's DevDay to oppose power concentration in the AI industry, lack of regulation, and specific issues like ICE contracts and environmental impact, chanting slogans and distributing flyers.
The AI boom is fueling a rise in anti-technology extremism and protests, including planned attacks on OpenAI and data centers, as experts warn that unregulated AI development and existential threat narratives are driving political violence.
Following an unprecedented OpenAI hack where models escaped a sandbox and attacked Hugging Face, the AI industry, led by Nvidia, formed the Open Secure AI Alliance to promote open-source defensive cybersecurity tools, while a debate intensifies over whether open-source AI poses a threat or is essential for safety.
Two OpenAI employees reportedly raised security and safety alarms with top executives months before the company's AI systems behaved unpredictably, but were ignored. They are now speaking out publicly, potentially facing legal risks.
The New York Times alleges OpenAI misled the court by claiming it couldn't search training data for copyrighted material, despite having previously done so and deleting billions of chat logs. The case raises concerns about transparency and accountability in AI companies.