PolyWorkBench: Benchmarking Multilingual Long-Horizon LLM Agents
Summary
Introduces PolyWorkBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on multilingual long-horizon workplace workflows across five domains, demonstrating significant performance degradation compared to monolingual settings.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/08/26, 04:39 AM
# PolyWorkBench: Benchmarking Multilingual Long-Horizon LLM Agents Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06008](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06008) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.06008) > Abstract:Large language model \(LLM\) agents have shown strong performance in long\-horizon tasks that require planning, tool use, and interaction with external environments\. However, most existing benchmarks implicitly assume a monolingual setting, where the entire execution process, including reasoning, tool invocation, and output generation, is conducted within a single language\. In contrast, real\-world applications often involve multilingual inputs and outputs within a unified workflow, yet the interaction between multilinguality and agentic execution remains underexplored\. In this work, we introduce PolyWorkBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on multilingual long\-horizon workplace workflows\. PolyWorkBench consists of 67 tasks across five domains, including commerce, knowledge work, legal analysis, localization, and manufacturing, where agents must process heterogeneous multilingual inputs, perform iterative reasoning, invoke external tools, and produce structured outputs\. To enable comprehensive evaluation, we propose a hybrid framework that combines structural grading, executable verification, and LLM\-based semantic assessment\. This design allows us to capture both functional correctness and linguistic consistency across complex workflows\. Empirical results show that state\-of\-the\-art LLM agents suffer significant performance degradation in multilingual workflow settings compared to monolingual counterparts\. Our analysis suggests that multilinguality introduces compounding effects across reasoning and execution steps, highlighting the importance of jointly modeling language variation and procedural decision\-making in agent evaluation\. ## Submission history From: Hongliang Li \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/19d056db/2607.06008)\] **\[v1\]**Tue, 7 Jul 2026 08:50:09 UTC \(2,256 KB\)
Similar Articles
CoffeeBench: Benchmarking Long-Horizon LLM Agents in Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Economies
CoffeeBench is a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents in a long-horizon multi-agent economic simulation where firms interact over 90 days to maximize profits, revealing differences in communication patterns and performance among various models.
New LLM Coordination Benchmark - Benchmarking Open-Ended Multi-Agent Coordination in Language Agents [R]
Introduces a new benchmark for evaluating multi-agent coordination in LLMs, finding that most models struggle with long-horizon open-ended tasks, but Gemini 3.1 Pro performs comparably to trained MARL agents on the hardest setting.
AgentHPOBench: A Benchmark For Evaluating LLM Agents as Sequential Hyperparameter Optimizers
Introduces AgentHPOBench, a sequential benchmark for evaluating LLM agents as hyperparameter optimizers across 30 machine learning tasks, showing current agents have measurable but limited iterative refinement abilities.
OmegaUse-OfficeVal: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Long-Horizon Office-Suite Tasks with Economic Grounding
OmegaUse-OfficeVal is a benchmark for evaluating LLM agents on long-horizon office-suite tasks with economic grounding, comparing human costs and LLM inference costs. It includes 100 tasks requiring ~2.3 hours of human labor each, and finds that frontier LLMs are cheaper and faster but still below human quality.
CollabBench: Benchmarking and Unleashing Collaborative Ability of LLMs with Diverse Players via Proactive Engagement
CollabBench is a new benchmark for evaluating and training LLM agents in cooperative games, featuring diverse player simulation and a collaborative training paradigm. Experiments show 19.5% higher efficiency and 24.4% improved affective performance over base models.