FairSelect: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Level and Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness
Summary
FairSelect is a toolkit for systematically evaluating fairness mitigation strategies across preprocessing, inprocessing, and postprocessing stages, supporting intersectional subgroup evaluation and comparison of fairness-utility tradeoffs.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/13/26, 07:56 AM
# FairSelect: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Level and Intersectional Algorithmic Fairness Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08953](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08953) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.08953) > Abstract:Algorithmic fairness methods are increasingly used to identify and mitigate bias in machine learning models, yet most approaches are evaluated in isolation and along single demographic axes\. This limits practical guidance for selecting fairness strategies, where disparities may arise across intersectional subgroups and across multiple stages of the modeling lifecycle\. This work presents FairSelect, a toolkit for systematically evaluating fairness mitigation strategies applied individually and in combination across preprocessing, inprocessing, and postprocessing stages\. FairSelect supports multiple model architectures, intersectional subgroup evaluation, and comparison of fairness utility tradeoffs across baseline, single method, and multi level configurations\. The framework was validated using synthetic clinical datasets designed to represent specific bias mechanisms and a real\-world replication of two\-year stroke risk prediction among patients with atrial fibrillation\. Synthetic experiments showed that targeted fairness methods generally reduced intended subgroup disparities, while combined strategies produced larger average fairness improvements with modest utility tradeoffs\. In the clinical prediction task, mitigation effects were highly variable, with some combinations improving both fairness and predictive performance while others were ineffective or counterproductive\. These findings demonstrate that fairness interventions interact in nonadditive and context dependent ways\. FairSelect provides a practical framework for systematically identifying fairness strategies that improve subgroup equity while preserving model performance in clinical machine learning\. ## Submission history From: Nicholas Souligne \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/9f90aeec/2607.08953)\] **\[v1\]**Thu, 9 Jul 2026 21:27:29 UTC \(340 KB\)
Similar Articles
Statistical and Structural Approaches to Algorithmic Fairness
This doctoral thesis critiques current fairness metrics in machine learning and proposes statistical hypothesis testing and structural analysis to address bias, emphasizing network and hierarchical contexts.
From Awareness to Action: Understanding and Overcoming the Research-Practice Gap in Algorithmic Fairness for Public Health
This paper investigates the gap between awareness and practice of algorithmic fairness in public health through a mixed-methods study, introducing the Fairness-to-Action framework to identify where translation stalls. The findings highlight weak institutionalization and system-level emphasis on accuracy over fairness.
GESD: Beyond Outcome-Oriented Fairness
This paper proposes GESD, a procedural-oriented fairness metric that measures disparities in explanation stability across subgroups, and integrates it into a multi-objective optimization framework for jointly optimizing utility, outcome fairness, and explanation fairness.
Detecting and Mitigating Bias by Treating Fairness as a Symmetry Operation
The paper proposes treating fairness as a symmetry operation in machine learning classifiers, implementing loss-based regularization to enforce invariance under swapping of sensitive attributes while holding merit features fixed. The framework achieves over 90% bias reduction with minimal accuracy loss and requires no causal graph knowledge.
Fair Reinforcement Learning
Fair Reinforcement Learning introduces Democratic Alignment to incorporate multiple competing value sets from different agents, overcoming traditional RLHF limitations, and achieves orders of magnitude faster optimization via a black-box policy wrapper.