NLNet Labs LLM Policy

Lobsters Hottest News

Summary

NLNet Labs announces a policy restricting the use of LLMs in code and documentation contributions, requiring disclosure of LLM use and prohibiting AI-generated code.

<p><a href="https://lobste.rs/s/s138jl/nlnet_labs_llm_policy">Comments</a></p>
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/27/26, 03:48 AM

# LLM Policy Source: [https://nlnetlabs.nl/llm-policy/](https://nlnetlabs.nl/llm-policy/) *Revised 26 June 2026* We restrict how Large Language Models \(LLMs\) can be used in the context of our organisation and our projects\. If a submission \(e\.g\. PR, issue, comment, forum post, etc\.\) does not comply with this policy, we may close or delete it without prior notice\. Note In addition to this policy, you must also comply with our[code of conduct](https://nlnetlabs.nl/conduct/)and the relevantCONTRIBUTING\.mdfile of the project\. ## Policy ### No output of LLMs in code or documentation We require all code and documentation contributions to be authored by a human\. You must not include content generated by LLMs or other probabilistic tools\. As an exception to this rule, a suggested fix generated by an LLM as part of a vulnerability or bug report may be included, because it can help pinpoint the underlying issue during triage\. ### Disclose LLM use We want to interact with humans, not with LLMs\. In your interactions with us, be respectful of our time, and disclose the use of an LLM\. This includes opening issues, sending vulnerability reports, and posting on our community forum\. Translation can be helpful if English is not your native language\. If you use machine translation when communicating with us, we encourage you to disclose such use to us so that both sides are aware of possible miscommunication as a result of mistranslation\. Alternatively, you could also write in your native language if you cannot assess the correctness of the translation\. Use of LLM translation is discouraged based on their generative attributes that would most likely confuse rather than ease the discussion\. ### LLM output remains your responsibility Your use of LLMs for linting, analysis or review is permitted under this policy\. However, you remain responsible for the output of an LLM\. If an LLM assists you in finding or analysing an issue, you remain responsible to understand and verify the correctness of the information you share with us\. ## Examples ### LLM\-assisted vulnerability reporting We accept reports of vulnerabilities found with LLMs\. With your report, you can include an LLM suggested fix to help us pinpoint the issue\. To comply with this policy, after the LLM finds an issue, you as the human contributor verify the issue and the estimated severity\. Then, when you send a report to[sep@nlnetlabs\.nl](mailto:[email protected])you must disclose the use of an LLM\. See the[security report](https://nlnetlabs.nl/security-report/)page for more information on reporting vulnerabilities to us\. ### PR creation We do not accept LLM\-generated contributions\. Any code you submit cannot be generated by an LLM\. When you open a PR, use your own words and be concise in the PR description\. In general, you should not open PRs for new features without talking to us first\. If you have ideas on how our software could change to accommodate your use\-case, please share your own thoughts on our[community forum](https://community.nlnetlabs.nl/)\.

Similar Articles

No LLM Code in Dependencies

Hacker News Top

The git-annex maintainer details efforts to remove dependencies containing LLM-generated code, expressing concerns about code quality and ethical implications.

Inference Engines for LLMs & Local AI Hardware (2026 Edition)

X AI KOLs

This article provides a comprehensive guide to LLM inference engines for local AI hardware in 2026, explaining how to choose based on hardware strategy, workload, and serving model, and covering engines like llama.cpp, MLX, ExLlamaV2/3, vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, and NVIDIA Dynamo.

Anthropic's new model Fable will silently handicap work on LLMs [D]

Reddit r/MachineLearning

Anthropic's new model Fable implements invisible safeguards that limit its effectiveness for requests related to frontier LLM development, such as building pretraining pipelines or distributed training infrastructure, to prevent accelerating actors violating terms of service.

no llm code

Lobsters Hottest

git-annex announces a policy to exclude LLM-generated code from its project due to copyright uncertainties, and provides a build flag to avoid dependencies that include such code.