@GergelyOrosz: So many things about AI infra and AI adoption today reminds me of Cloud adoption in the 2010s. Cloud is assumed to decr…
Summary
Gergely Orosz compares current AI infrastructure adoption trends to the cloud computing boom of the 2010s, highlighting similarities in cost dynamics, integration timelines, and customer indifference to backend technologies.
Similar Articles
@GergelyOrosz: Just reflecting on two things that have NOT gotten visibly faster with AI: 1. Launching financial services in a new cou…
Gergely Orosz reflects on areas where AI has not accelerated progress, such as launching financial services across regions and supporting old hardware, noting that software was never the main bottleneck.
The AI stack is starting to look suspiciously like the cloud stack
The article discusses how AI implementation mirrors cloud infrastructure, using a freight brokerage example to highlight hidden costs and complexity. It argues for optimizing AI systems rather than removing them, reducing manual oversight.
AI feels like this generation’s internet boom.
The article draws parallels between the current AI boom and past internet, smartphone, and cloud computing booms, noting that despite public skepticism, AI is rapidly being adopted across industries. It highlights platforms like BingX offering pre-IPO AI investment opportunities.
Feels like AI is entering its “infrastructure matters” phase
The article highlights a shift in the AI industry where the focus is moving from purely model benchmark performance to infrastructure challenges like latency, orchestration, and cost efficiency. It suggests that AI is maturing into a systems problem, with real-world experience becoming more important than raw model capability.
@GergelyOrosz: Agentic infra became its own discipline inside many tech companies (often existing infra teams "morphing" into AI infra…
Agentic infrastructure has rapidly emerged as a distinct discipline in numerous technology firms, often transforming existing infrastructure teams into AI-focused groups.