I just bought Asus Ascent : Nvidia GB10 (DGX) and It is slower than my Ryzen Ai Max
Summary
A user reports that their Asus Ascent with Nvidia GB10 (DGX) is slower than their Ryzen AI Max when running LLMs like Gemma4-31B, despite expected 2-4x speedup, and shares their llama-cpp configuration for debugging.
Similar Articles
@pupposandro: 2.5x faster than llama.cpp on Strix Halo. We just shipped DFlash + PFlash for the AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 iGPU (gfx1151, …
A new toolset (DFlash + PFlash) achieves 2.5x faster inference than llama.cpp on AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 iGPU, demonstrating significant speedups for Qwen3.6-27B with 128 GiB unified memory.
Dual dgx spark (Asus GX10) MiniMax M2.7 results
User benchmarks dual Asus GX10 (DGX Spark) running MiniMax-M2.7-AWQ-4bit, achieving 30–40 tokens/s while drawing only ~100 W each, replacing noisy multi-GPU rigs.
@analogalok: i just ran Google's brand new Unsloth Gemma4 12B dense GGUF on my RTX 4060 using llama.cpp + CUDA 13.2 21 tokens per se…
Google's new Gemma 4 12B is a single decoder-only transformer with encoder-free multimodal input, achieving strong benchmarks while being small enough to run locally on a budget GPU. It is released under Apache 2.0 license.
A 10 year old Xeon is all you need
A blog post detailing how to run the Gemma 4 AI model on a 10-year-old Xeon server with only CPU and DDR3 RAM, using customized llama.cpp optimizations.
@googlegemma: Gemma 4 E2B goes super fast on Intel AI PCs thanks to LiteRT NPU support on OpenVINO! 1.3x faster prefill performance o…
Gemma 4 E2B achieves 1.3x faster prefill and 2.8x better performance-per-watt on Intel AI PCs using OpenVINO with LiteRT NPU support, enabling efficient background LLM tasks.