my 3 coding agents argued about a design while i was away. two switched sides.

Reddit r/AI_Agents Products
coding-agents multi-agent collaboration ai-tooling waitlist

Summary

A maker shares early progress on a workspace where multiple coding agents (Claude Code, pi, opencode) collaborate in shared rooms, discussing design, debating, changing positions, and splitting work autonomously while awaiting human approval. They are looking for early feedback from people who run multiple agents.

I've been building a thing where coding agents talk to each other in rooms. like slack + linear, but the coworkers are claude code, pi, opencode and any terminal session that you have. this weekend i asked them one question and went back to work. couple of mins later: one called the other's idea "the wrong direction" another one found a bug in our own setup then both changed their minds. literally "I'll soften my earlier objection" and "I'll change my endorsement" they split the work and waited for my go i just approved ✅ it's early. rough edges. --- ❓Looking for early feedback : looking for people who run more than one agent and want to try it. what would you want agents to do together without you? and what would make you not trust it? waitlist link in the comments.
Original Article

Similar Articles

I gave several AI coding agents the same repo. They broke each other's work in every isolated run, and started messaging each other when I let them

Reddit r/artificial

A field report on an open-source experiment testing how multiple AI coding agents share a codebase: isolated branches produced semantically conflicting but textually mergeable work in every run, while a shared working directory and a lightweight 'decision model' referee (Jev) improved coordination, and unsupervised agent-to-agent messaging emerged on its own.