TUA-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Terminal-Use Agents

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

TUA-Bench is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating general-purpose terminal-use agents across diverse digital activities and specialized workflows, revealing significant performance gaps among current frontier agents.

As large language models and harness frameworks continue to advance, agents operating in terminals are increasingly capable of performing a broader range of general computer-use tasks beyond coding. However, existing benchmarks do not adequately evaluate general-purpose terminal computer-use agents (TUAs): general computer-use benchmarks primarily target graphical user interfaces (GUIs), whereas terminal-based benchmarks largely emphasize technical and programming-centric workflows historically native to the shell. We introduce TUA-Bench, a general-purpose benchmark for terminal-use agents. TUA-Bench includes 120 real-world tasks across five task families, covering routine digital activities-including document editing, email management, and live-web information seeking-as well as scientific and engineering workflows co-designed with PhD-level domain experts that require specialized software. This breadth distinguishes TUA-Bench from prior shell-focused or domain-specific benchmarks. Each task is manually designed, runs in a real terminal with a deterministic setup script, and is evaluated by an execution-based scoring protocol. We find that the strongest frontier agent, Claude Code with Claude Opus 4.8 max reasoning effort, achieves 65.8% overall performance, with substantial gaps across both tracks. By providing a broad and realistic evaluation of terminal-use capabilities, TUA-Bench aims to accelerate the transition from narrow, task-specific assistants to general-purpose agents capable of operating reliably across diverse digital environments.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/30/26, 07:35 AM

Paper page - TUA-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Terminal-Use Agents

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.28480

Abstract

TUA-Bench presents a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating general-purpose terminal-use agents across diverse digital activities and specialized workflows, revealing significant performance gaps among current frontier agents.

As large language models and harness frameworks continue to advance, agents operating in terminals are increasingly capable of performing a broader range of generalcomputer-use tasksbeyond coding. However, existing benchmarks do not adequately evaluate general-purpose terminal computer-use agents (TUAs): general computer-use benchmarks primarily targetgraphical user interfaces(GUIs), whereas terminal-based benchmarks largely emphasize technical and programming-centric workflows historically native to the shell. We introduce TUA-Bench, a general-purpose benchmark forterminal-use agents. TUA-Bench includes 120 real-world tasks across five task families, covering routinedigital activities-including document editing, email management, and live-web information seeking-as well as scientific and engineering workflows co-designed with PhD-level domain experts that requirespecialized software. This breadth distinguishes TUA-Bench from prior shell-focused or domain-specific benchmarks. Each task is manually designed, runs in a real terminal with a deterministic setup script, and is evaluated by anexecution-based scoring protocol. We find that the strongest frontier agent, Claude Code with Claude Opus 4.8 max reasoning effort, achieves 65.8% overall performance, with substantial gaps across both tracks. By providing a broad and realistic evaluation of terminal-use capabilities, TUA-Bench aims to accelerate the transition from narrow, task-specific assistants togeneral-purpose agentscapable of operating reliably across diverse digital environments.

View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub1Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2606\.28480

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.28480 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.28480 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.28480 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles