Is there any reason for a lack of love for Gemma 4 26b?
Summary
A user asks why Gemma 4 26b receives less attention compared to Qwen models, sharing their experience using these models for a personal assistant project on a 3090.
Similar Articles
Those of you who like Gemma4 models - how are you guys using them?
A developer shares their mixed experience running Gemma4 and Qwen locally for coding tasks, noting issues with tool integration, loop handling, and task completion while asking the community for better usage strategies.
Gemma 4 is still lazy
User reports that Gemma 4 is lazy and poor at multi-turn agentic tasks compared to other models like Qwen, DeepSeek, and GPT-OSS, despite being a good chatbot.
Gemma 4 12B is my new main squeeze
The author shares their experience switching from Qwen 3.6 to Gemma 4 12B (Unsloth Q5_K_XL) for local coding, praising its plug-and-play setup, better syntax accuracy, and manageable VRAM usage despite a slight speed trade-off.
Is Gemma 4 E4B still the best small model for a local, tool-calling personal assistant? What am I missing?
A user asks whether Gemma 4 E4B remains the best small multimodal model (under 8B/6GB) for running a local, tool-calling personal assistant on a Mac via MLX, noting failures with Ling 3.0 tiny, LFM models, and Qwen 3.5 4B/9B.
Appreciation for Gemma 4 26b A4b
A user shares their positive experience with Gemma 4 26b A4b, praising its speed, multimodal ability, and strong language capabilities, especially in German, while noting it handles various tasks well despite not matching Qwen's agentic and coding performance.