CulturalRiddles: A Multicultural Benchmark of Riddles

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

We propose CulturalRiddles, a benchmark of 62 cultures (45 countries, 51 languages) of human-created, culturally grounded riddles requiring abductive and compositional reasoning. Even frontier LLMs reach at most 22% accuracy on some communities, highlighting gaps in cultural understanding.

As LLMs expand their language coverage, evaluating how well they understand and represent diverse cultures becomes increasingly important. However, many benchmarks remain English-centric, with limited cultural coverage and a focus on factual knowledge over its application in real-world cultural contexts. We propose CulturalRiddles, a benchmark of original, culturally grounded riddles created entirely by humans through a participatory community effort, spanning 62 cultures (45 countries, 51 languages). These riddles are deeply rooted in their respective cultures and require abductive and compositional reasoning, alongside detailed factual and social knowledge, language skills, and an understanding of culturally specific associations. We benchmark 28 LLM configurations using both automatic and large-scale human evaluation. Even frontier models achieve at most 22% accuracy in some communities. We publicly release all artifacts alongside an open contribution process to expand the benchmark's linguistic and cultural coverage.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 10/22/26, 03:42 PM

Paper page - CulturalRiddles: A Multicultural Benchmark of Riddles

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2610.29968 Authors:

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

Abstract

AsLLMsexpandtheirlanguagecoverage,evaluatinghowwelltheyunderstandandrepresentdiverseculturesbecomesincreasinglyimportant.However,manybenchmarksremainEnglish-centric,withlimitedculturalcoverageandafocusonfactualknowledgeoveritsapplicationinreal-worldculturalcontexts.WeproposeCulturalRiddles,abenchmarkoforiginal,culturallygroundedriddlescreatedentirelybyhumansthroughaparticipatorycommunityeffort,spanning62cultures(45countries,51languages).Theseriddlesaredeeplyrootedintheirrespectiveculturesandrequireabductiveandcompositionalreasoning,alongsidedetailedfactualandsocialknowledge,languageskills,andanunderstandingofculturallyspecificassociations.Webenchmark28LLMconfigurationsusingbothautomaticandlarge-scalehumanevaluation.Evenfrontiermodelsachieveatmost22%accuracyinsomecommunities.Wepubliclyreleaseallartifactsalongsideanopencontributionprocesstoexpandthebenchmark’slinguisticandculturalcoverage.

View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub4Add to collection

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.29968 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.29968 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.29968 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

CulturalMenuBench: Probing the Knowledge-Application Gap in Multimodal Culinary Reasoning

arXiv cs.AI

This paper introduces CulturalMenuBench, a benchmark with 4,870 items across 10 languages and 18 regions, to test multimodal models' ability to apply culinary knowledge beyond mere recognition. Evaluations reveal a knowledge-application gap where models drop in performance when requiring cultural attribution despite high recognition scores.