Tell HN: GitHub refuses to remove cracked copies of my software after a month
Summary
The developer of Photopea reports that GitHub declined his DMCA takedown notice for tens of repositories containing AI-extracted, ad-stripped copies of his web-based photo editor, citing failure to confirm a violation of 17 U.S. Code § 1201.
Similar Articles
GitHub has not removed malicious imitation software after 3 weeks
An author reported malicious imitation software containing malware on GitHub, but GitHub failed to remove it for three weeks despite multiple reports, only taking action after the incident gained attention on Hacker News.
Ask HN: GitHub employees what's going on? Why?
A Hacker News discussion explores GitHub's challenges with the surge in AI-boosted coding commits and debates potential solutions like limiting free private repositories.
github and the crime against software
This article criticizes GitHub for frequent outages, poor reliability, and prioritizing AI features over fundamental infrastructure, arguing it reflects broader decay in big tech software services.
What's Wrong with GitHub
GNU Project publishes an article urging developers to avoid hosting repositories on GitHub, criticizing its licensing confusion, mandatory nonfree JavaScript, SaaSS practices, and centralization of the distributed Git ecosystem.
@dabit3: Super interesting story that shows how the current state of @github is unable to protect open source maintainers from A…
A story detailing how AI bots overwhelmed a GitHub repository with spam comments and untested PRs after a $900 bounty was posted, forcing maintainers to implement workarounds like contributor whitelists and reputation bots, highlighting GitHub's lack of anti-bot mechanisms.