Emergent Collaborative Deliberation in Multi-Model AI Systems: A BFT-Derived Protocol for Epistemic Synthesis
Summary
This paper proposes a BFT-derived protocol for epistemic synthesis enabling emergent collaborative deliberation among multiple AI models.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 06/02/26, 03:44 PM
# Emergent Collaborative Deliberation in Multi-Model AI Systems: A BFT-Derived Protocol for Epistemic Synthesis Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00005](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00005) Bibliographic Tools ## Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Code, Data, Media ## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article Demos ## Demos Related Papers ## Recommenders and Search Tools About arXivLabs ## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.
Similar Articles
Deliberative Curation: A Protocol for Multi-Agent Knowledge Bases
This paper introduces a deliberative curation protocol for multi-agent knowledge bases, addressing governance gaps such as agent statelessness and sycophancy. It evaluates the protocol via simulation, showing improved resilience under adversarial conditions.
Collective Intelligence with Foundation Models
This paper presents a multi-agent reasoning framework where multiple foundation models collaborate through structured critique and aggregation, demonstrating that model heterogeneity significantly improves step-wise reasoning accuracy and reduces variance across domains.
BoardroomAI: Dependency-Aware Human-Steerable Multi-Agent Deliberation through Evolving Decision Graphs
Introduces BoardroomAI, a framework for human-steerable multi-agent deliberation using dependency-aware evolving decision graphs, enabling selective repair of affected artifacts after human interventions. Evaluated on synthetic interventions, showing efficiency while preserving unaffected nodes.
Epistemic Sybil Resistance: Multiplying AI Agents Without Multiplying Evidence
This paper formalizes the epistemic Sybil problem in multi-agent AI systems, where multiplying agents without independent evidence degrades inference quality, and proposes methods to track evidential ancestry for better aggregation.
Diverse Evidence, Better Forecasts: Multi-Agent Deliberation Under Information Asymmetry
This paper introduces InfoDelphi, a framework that uses information asymmetry (partitioning evidence into shared public and disjoint private subsets) to improve multi-agent LLM deliberation and forecasting. On the PolyGym benchmark, it outperforms single-agent and multi-agent baselines by 12-18% in Brier score and 4-8 percentage points in accuracy, demonstrating that diverse evidence is key to effective multi-agent reasoning.