Emergent Collaborative Deliberation in Multi-Model AI Systems: A BFT-Derived Protocol for Epistemic Synthesis

arXiv cs.AI Papers

Summary

This paper proposes a BFT-derived protocol for epistemic synthesis enabling emergent collaborative deliberation among multiple AI models.

arXiv:2606.00005v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present the Consilium Protocol, a Byzantine Fault Tolerance-derived architecture for structured multi-model AI deliberation that treats inter-model disagreement as epistemic signal rather than error. The protocol assigns engineered cognitive personas to language models -- separating what a model is from how it reasons -- and introduces an In-Sample/Out-of-Sample validation framework adapted from quantitative finance to distinguish training-data consensus from empirically grounded conclusions. Across 1,478 deliberation sessions spanning 32 topics in 10 domain categories, we demonstrate that (1) the cognitive persona, not the underlying model, determines epistemic behavior: free edge-inference models costing 0.0002 USD per batch produced comparable analytical output to frontier models costing 10.69 USD; (2) RLHF alignment training creates measurable, domain-specific epistemic blind spots -- contested policy topics exhibit 12.3 percentage points less adversarial challenge than settled science topics, and AI safety topics show asymmetric bias ($\Delta$=11.6%) where models challenge claims that AI is dangerous far more vigorously than claims that AI risk is overstated; (3) the protocol exhibits no directional bias of its own (immigration $\Delta$=2.3%, renewables $\Delta$=1.2%); and (4) out-of-sample evidence retrieval validated 239 claims with 100% evidence retrieval and surfaced 167 blind-spot discoveries invisible to training-data deliberation. Run-to-run reproducibility across randomized model$\times$persona assignments averages $\pm$2.2% standard deviation. Total cost for the complete battery including all overhead: 217 USD. We release the protocol specification under MIT license to enable independent verification.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/02/26, 03:44 PM

# Emergent Collaborative Deliberation in Multi-Model AI Systems: A BFT-Derived Protocol for Epistemic Synthesis
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00005](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00005)
Bibliographic Tools

## Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

## Demos

Related Papers

## Recommenders and Search Tools

About arXivLabs

## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.

Similar Articles

Deliberative Curation: A Protocol for Multi-Agent Knowledge Bases

arXiv cs.AI

This paper introduces a deliberative curation protocol for multi-agent knowledge bases, addressing governance gaps such as agent statelessness and sycophancy. It evaluates the protocol via simulation, showing improved resilience under adversarial conditions.

Collective Intelligence with Foundation Models

arXiv cs.CL

This paper presents a multi-agent reasoning framework where multiple foundation models collaborate through structured critique and aggregation, demonstrating that model heterogeneity significantly improves step-wise reasoning accuracy and reduces variance across domains.

Diverse Evidence, Better Forecasts: Multi-Agent Deliberation Under Information Asymmetry

arXiv cs.AI

This paper introduces InfoDelphi, a framework that uses information asymmetry (partitioning evidence into shared public and disjoint private subsets) to improve multi-agent LLM deliberation and forecasting. On the PolyGym benchmark, it outperforms single-agent and multi-agent baselines by 12-18% in Brier score and 4-8 percentage points in accuracy, demonstrating that diverse evidence is key to effective multi-agent reasoning.