TRIAGE: Role-Typed Credit Assignment for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

Introduces TRIAGE, a role-typed credit assignment framework that improves agentic reinforcement learning by providing more nuanced credit assignment than standard GRPO methods, using a structured judge to classify action segments and assign process rewards based on semantic roles.

Agentic reinforcement learning requires assigning credit to environment-facing actions such as searches, clicks, edits, navigation commands, and object interactions. Standard GRPO uses the final verifier outcome as a uniform advantage over all action tokens. This outcome signal is useful but structurally incomplete: it punishes useful exploration in failed rollouts and reinforces redundant or regressive actions in successful rollouts. We propose TRIAGE, a role-typed credit assignment framework that adds a semantic role axis to outcome credit. A structured judge classifies each segment as decisive progress, useful exploration, no-progress infrastructure, or regression, and a fixed role-conditioned rule maps these labels to bounded segment-level process rewards. This keeps verifier outcomes as the source of optimization direction while correcting the two main blind spots of outcome-only credit. We further show that role-conditioned credit is the optimal segment-level correction expressible from role labels alone -- a projection of the per-segment advantage residual onto the role variable -- so that the fixed role constants reduce advantage estimation error whenever the judge is reliable, and we connect this to lower-variance policy gradients. Across ALFWorld, Search-QA, and WebShop, TRIAGE improves success rates over GRPO for two policy models and outperforms both a scalar judge-derived process reward and an outcome-supervised shared-backbone value baseline. Ablations show that the gain comes from role typing rather than merely adding dense rewards: reliable detection of regression inside successful trajectories is the dominant contributor, while exploration credit provides a consistent secondary gain; on completed ALFWorld and WebShop rollouts, TRIAGE also reduces environment-facing turns by an additional 10.4% and 14.8% relative to GRPO.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 07/01/26, 07:44 PM

Paper page - TRIAGE: Role-Typed Credit Assignment for Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2606.32017

Abstract

TRIAGE introduces a role-typed credit assignment framework that enhances agentic reinforcement learning by providing more nuanced credit assignment than standard GRPO methods.

Agentic reinforcement learningrequires assigning credit to environment-facing actions such as searches, clicks, edits, navigation commands, and object interactions. StandardGRPOuses the finalverifier outcomeas a uniform advantage over all action tokens. This outcome signal is useful but structurally incomplete: it punishes useful exploration in failed rollouts and reinforces redundant or regressive actions in successful rollouts. We propose TRIAGE, a role-typedcredit assignmentframework that adds asemantic role axisto outcome credit. Astructured judgeclassifies each segment as decisive progress, useful exploration, no-progress infrastructure, or regression, and a fixedrole-conditioned rulemaps these labels to bounded segment-level process rewards. This keepsverifier outcomes as the source of optimization direction while correcting the two main blind spots of outcome-only credit. We further show that role-conditioned credit is the optimal segment-level correction expressible from role labels alone -- a projection of the per-segment advantage residual onto the role variable -- so that the fixed role constants reduceadvantage estimationerror whenever the judge is reliable, and we connect this to lower-variancepolicy gradients. AcrossALFWorld,Search-QA, andWebShop, TRIAGE improves success rates overGRPOfor two policy models and outperforms both a scalar judge-derived process reward and an outcome-supervised shared-backbone value baseline. Ablations show that the gain comes from role typing rather than merely adding dense rewards: reliable detection of regression inside successful trajectories is the dominant contributor, while exploration credit provides a consistent secondary gain; on completedALFWorldandWebShoprollouts, TRIAGE also reduces environment-facing turns by an additional 10.4% and 14.8% relative toGRPO.

View arXiv pageView PDFAdd to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2606\.32017

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.32017 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.32017 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.32017 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

@omarsar0: Good paper on credit assignment for agent RL. The main finding is that you want an LLM judge to choose where to check a…

X AI KOLs Following

The ProVer paper targets pivotal decisions for credit assignment in agentic RL: an LLM judge compares successful and failed rollouts to propose a key trajectory segment, then rollouts sampled before and after that segment estimate its advantage. It improves over GRPO by 9.91% and 7.12% on Qwen3.5-2B and Qwen3.5-4B across ALFWorld, WebShop, and SearchQA.