This is why the vast majority aren't taking any "this new model is dangerous" messages seriously. They've cried wolf FAR too many times. They could literally announce that a nuclear war caused by AI is 24 hours away and many wouldn't bat an eye
Summary
The tweet argues that repeated false alarms about AI dangers have made the public desensitized, so serious warnings like an imminent AI-caused catastrophe are widely ignored.
Similar Articles
How much of the latest AI incidents are actually realistically dangerous?
This article questions the realistic dangers of recent AI incidents reported by OpenAI and critiques media fear-mongering for clicks.
The contagion of fear
Bryan Cantrill criticizes alarmist claims about AI extinction risks, emphasizing the need for experts to be responsible in their public statements to maintain trust.
The AI doomsayers can't get their message out
AI doomsayers, despite their expertise in AI research, struggle to effectively communicate their concerns about AI risks to the general public, underscoring challenges in messaging and public outreach.
Why does the media want the masses to fear AI?
This post speculates that the media's portrayal of AI as fearful is driven by product profitability rather than genuine existential threats.
Regarding the recent viral tweets from AI researchers, how worried should we be?
The article discusses anxiety over viral tweets from AI researchers about existential AI threats, questioning the rapid progression from chatgpt to world-ending scenarios and whether it is fearmongering.