Full duplex vs half duplex - the spectrum of AI voice models [D]

Reddit r/MachineLearning News

Summary

An analysis of half-duplex vs full-duplex architecture in AI voice models, discussing key features like overlap, backchannels, and barge-in that make voice agents sound robotic.

It seems that there are two ways to build voice AI: Half-duplex: strict turn-taking. You speak, the other side waits until you’re done, one direction of speech at a time. ← This is how almost every voice assistant works today. Full-duplex: two channels, both sides can talk at any time - no more waiting for your “turn”. ← This is the way humans actually talk. In fact, there are three crucial things half-duplex voice models can't really do: * Overlap - talking and listening at the same time without falling apart * Backchannels - the "mhms," "rights," and "yeahs" you drop in while the other person is still going * Barge-in - getting interrupted mid-sentence and recovering gracefully These three features are a big reason why voice agents still feel “robotic” to this day. But what exactly is the spectrum from half-duplex to full-duplex? Is a Moshi-style architecture the only way to approach full-duplex natural voice conversations? What are ways half-duplex systems could imitate full-duplex? Would love to hear others' thoughts on this.
Original Article

Similar Articles

Full-Duplex Speech Models Take the Floor When Asked, Not When Needed

arXiv cs.CL

This paper evaluates full-duplex speech models' ability to decide when to speak, finding that models like Moshi and PersonaPlex primarily respond to being addressed or silence rather than content-driven triggers such as false claims or hazards, identifying a gap in content understanding.

Voice AI Architecture Discussion

Reddit r/AI_Agents

The article discusses the tradeoff between latency and control in voice AI architectures, comparing traditional cascaded systems with end-to-end models, and seeks community input on current practices.