Scaling Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models: Development and Validation of the Smart Coder Framework for Human-LLM Collaborative Coding
Summary
论文提出 Smart Coder 框架,通过指令、提示策略和可靠性检查三阶段结构化人机协作的定性编码流程,并在 72 份中学数学教师访谈转录中验证,表明指令与思维链提示能显著提升 LLM 编码一致性。
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 10/28/26, 01:57 AM
# Scaling Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models: Development and Validation of the Smart Coder Framework for Human-LLM Collaborative Coding Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33205](https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33205) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.33205) > Abstract:Current uses of large language models \(LLMs\) for qualitative coding often rely on ad hoc prompting with limited guidance for reliability and human oversight\. To address these limitations, we propose the Smart Coder Framework, a three\-phase approach structuring human\-LLM collaborative coding through Instruction, Prompt Strategy, and Reliability Check\. We evaluated the framework using 72 middle\-school mathematics teacher interview transcripts and a human\-consensus benchmark\. A factorial design compared instructed versus uninstructed prompts, few\-shot versus few\-shot plus chain\-of\-thought prompting, and single\-pass versus self\-consistency coding\. Twelve transcripts were used for prompt development and calibration, and 60 for the formal evaluation\. In the results, instruction consistently improved agreement\. Chain\-of\-thought further improved agreement under adequate instruction, and self\-consistency produced smaller, theme\-dependent gains but helped identify unstable decisions for human review\. Performance also varied by transcript characteristics\. Overall, the framework systematically structures and monitors LLM\-assisted qualitative coding while preserving human authority over coding decisions\. ## Submission history From: Cheng Tang \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/cfbcfe21/2610.33205)\] **\[v1\]**Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:52:09 UTC \(830 KB\)
Similar Articles
Can Large Language Models Reliably Code Qualitative Humanitarian Data? A Benchmark Study Against Human Expert Adjudication
This benchmark study evaluates 46 large language models against human experts for coding qualitative humanitarian data, finding that LLMs can achieve comparable reliability with structured prompts and reasoning, but require careful oversight for nuanced themes.
Observational Equivalence of LLM and Human Annotation
This paper demonstrates that large language models (LLMs) achieve annotation quality equivalent to human experts, suggesting the main challenge is minimizing ambiguity in coding rules rather than choosing between human and machine coders.
AI Coding Agents in Social Science: Methodologically Diverse, Empirically Consistent, Interpretively Vulnerable
This paper evaluates LLM-based coding agents (Claude Code and Codex) in social science analysis, finding they match or exceed human methodological diversity while remaining vulnerable to interpretation bias through verdict-layer manipulation.
Beyond Binary Labels: Diagnostic Evaluation of LLM Safety with Prompt-Level Rubrics
该论文提出 DiagSafe 诊断式评估框架,用提示级评分标准(prompt-level rubrics)替代二元安全标签,构建了中英双语、基于 84 类安全分类体系的基准,使 LLM-as-a-judge 与人工标注的一致性达到 95.34%(Cohen's κ=0.864),并揭示了主流模型在中文与多轮对话场景下的独特漏洞。
LLMs program using Reusable and Composable Abstract Representations
该论文发现 LLM 在生成代码时,中间层会涌现可复用、可组合的抽象表征,这些表征将功能、编程语言和实现策略分解为可独立操纵的成分,通过激活引导可灵活组合控制代码生成,且微调可跨编程语言迁移,验证并扩展了 Factored World Hypothesis 框架。