Why AI hasn’t replaced software engineers, and won’t

Simon Willison's Blog News

Summary

Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor argue that AI will not replace software engineers, citing bottlenecks like deciding what to build, verification, and deep human understanding as key to the profession's resilience against automation.

No content available
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 06/15/26, 12:56 AM

# Why AI hasn’t replaced software engineers, and won’t Source: [https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jun/14/why-ai-hasnt-replaced-software-engineers/](https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jun/14/why-ai-hasnt-replaced-software-engineers/) 14th June 2026 \- Link Blog **[Why AI hasn’t replaced software engineers, and won’t](https://www.normaltech.ai/p/why-ai-hasnt-replaced-software-engineers)**\. Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kappor take on the question of AI job losses through the lens of a profession that is uniquely suited to AI disruption \- software engineering\. > In this essay, we argue that there is enough evidence to reject the narrative that once AI capabilities reach a certain threshold, it will cause mass layoffs\. Given that this is true even in a sector with very few regulatory barriers, most other professions are likely to be even more cushioned\. The first good news is that the data still doesn't support the idea that AI is causing mass unemployment\. > In March 2025, New York became the first U\.S\. state to add an AI disclosure checkbox to WARN Act filings\. In the full first year, more than 160 companies filed WARN notices\.[Not a single one](https://www.hunton.com/hunton-employment-labor-perspectives/new-york-warn-act-no-ai-related-layoffs-reported-in-first-year-of-adding-ai-related-disclosure-to-the-system)checked the AI box AI speeds up the typing\-code\-into\-a\-computer phase, but it turns out software engineering is about a whole lot more than that: > If writing code isn’t the bottleneck, what is? The task\-breakdown surveys point at things like meetings or debugging\. This just leads to more questions: what are developers doing in those meetings and why can’t it be done by AI? Won’t debugging get automated as capabilities improve? To understand the real bottlenecks, we have to get qualitative, and dig into software engineers’ own understanding of what it is they do that resists automation\. When we did this analysis, it revealed three things as the real bottlenecks \(1\) deciding and specifying what to build, \(2\) verifying and being accountable for what is delivered, and \(3\) the deep human understanding — of the codebase, the business, and the environment — required to carry out both of these\. I'm finding AI assistance also helps me with the deciding and verifying steps, but it's the "deep human understanding" that remains key to the value I provide\. Give me all of the AI assistance in the world and the value I produce will still be reliant on how deeply I understand both the problems and the solutions that the agents are building for them\.

Similar Articles

Why AI hasn't replaced software engineers, and won't

Hacker News Top

This essay argues that AI will not replace software engineers because the 'decide' and 'deliver' layers of knowledge work resist automation, and evidence from recent layoffs at Block and Snap shows that CEOs often overestimate AI's capabilities.

Will AI replace developers?

Reddit r/AI_Agents

Explores the debate over whether AI will eventually replace human software developers, examining current capabilities and future trends.

What's gonna happen to software engineers?

Hacker News Top

A software engineer reflects on how AI will affect the profession, proposing two categories of developers and arguing that the role will adapt rather than disappear.

I dont get the "AI will replace devs" angle

Reddit r/ArtificialInteligence

A user recounts a conversation where their retired CTO uncle argues AI will replace developers, but the user counters that human validation, cost, and risk management still require human oversight, dismissing the idea as overhyped.