WearableQA: A Benchmark for Health Reasoning over Real-World Wearable Data

Hugging Face Daily Papers Papers

Summary

WearableQA is a benchmark for evaluating large language models' reasoning over real-world wearable health data, using multiple-choice questions derived from longitudinal measurements.

Recent advances in wearable sensing enable continuous monitoring of physiological and behavioral signals, yet existing benchmarks rarely evaluate whether AI systems can reason over a real user's longitudinal wearable record. We introduce WearableQA, a benchmark comprising 4,084 10-option multiple-choice questions constructed from the wearable time series, blood biomarkers, and demographics of 200 real users, each with up to 500 days of daily measurements. WearableQA preserves authentic wearable distributions that include device noise and inter-individual variability. To evaluate distinct reasoning capabilities, we introduce 16 question types organized along two complementary axes: data versus health reasoning, which distinguishes computation over longitudinal measurements from physiological interpretation; and single- versus cross-signal reasoning, which separates reasoning about individual signals from the integration of multiple signals. To construct reliable questions at scale, we adopt a dual-grounding framework that combines literature-grounded physiological findings with statistically validated population-grounded physiological patterns. This enables the capture of meaningful relationships observed in real-world wearable data. Evaluation of 14 proprietary and open-source LLMs demonstrates that WearableQA effectively differentiates model capabilities, with performance ranging from 19.6% to 72.9% against a 10% chance baseline. Moreover, WearableQA remains far from solved: most models achieve accuracies below 60%. Overall, WearableQA provides a realistic and diagnostic benchmark for evaluating LLM reasoning over real-world wearable data.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/10/26, 06:09 AM

Paper page - WearableQA: A Benchmark for Health Reasoning over Real-World Wearable Data

Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2609.05405

Abstract

WearableQA is a benchmark of multiple-choice questions derived from real longitudinal wearable data that evaluates large language model reasoning across data and health dimensions.

Recent advances in wearable sensing enable continuous monitoring of physiological and behavioral signals, yet existing benchmarks rarely evaluate whether AI systems can reason over a real user’s longitudinal wearable record. We introduce WearableQA, a benchmark comprising 4,084 10-option multiple-choice questions constructed from the wearable time series, blood biomarkers, and demographics of 200 real users, each with up to 500 days of daily measurements. WearableQA preserves authentic wearable distributions that include device noise and inter-individual variability. To evaluate distinct reasoning capabilities, we introduce 16 question types organized along two complementary axes: data versus health reasoning, which distinguishes computation over longitudinal measurements from physiological interpretation; and single- versuscross-signal reasoning, which separates reasoning about individual signals from the integration of multiple signals. To construct reliable questions at scale, we adopt adual-grounding frameworkthat combines literature-grounded physiological findings with statistically validated population-grounded physiological patterns. This enables the capture of meaningful relationships observed in real-world wearable data. Evaluation of 14 proprietary and open-sourceLLMsdemonstrates that WearableQA effectively differentiates model capabilities, with performance ranging from 19.6% to 72.9% against a 10% chance baseline. Moreover, WearableQA remains far from solved: most models achieve accuracies below 60%. Overall, WearableQA provides a realistic and diagnostic benchmark for evaluating LLM reasoning over real-world wearable data.

View arXiv pageView PDFGitHub6Add to collection

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609\.05405

Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash

Models citing this paper0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.05405 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper1

#### facebook/WearableQA Viewer• Updated6 days ago • 20.4k • 10

Spaces citing this paper0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.05405 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.

Similar Articles

Introducing HealthBench

OpenAI Blog

OpenAI introduces HealthBench, a new benchmark for evaluating AI systems in healthcare contexts, created with 262 physicians across 60 countries. The benchmark includes 5,000 realistic health conversations with physician-written rubrics to assess model performance on meaningful, trustworthy, and improvable metrics.

OpenMHC: Accelerating the Science of Wearable Foundation Models

arXiv cs.LG

OpenMHC introduces the largest open-access wearable health dataset with over 60 million hours of data and open-source implementations of wearable foundation models, including a unified benchmark for prediction, imputation, and forecasting.