@HaiyuWu1: Recent discussions about open-sourcing make me feel that I should go back and revisit these important open-source works…
Summary
The author revisits influential open-source works in representation learning, listing key papers from MoCo v1 to LeJEPA that advanced vision foundation models and self-supervised learning.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/27/26, 09:58 PM
Recent discussions about open-sourcing make me feel that I should go back and revisit these important open-source works in representation learning that pushed the field forward and eventually made vision foundation models so useful in applications.
These are the papers that come to mind. Feel free to correct my opinions and share any important papers that I may have missed.
MoCo v1 (2019-11) – ResNet Method: contrastive loss + a queue of samples from previous batches for negative pairing + EMA-based weight updates
of training branches: 2
Effect: EMA-based weight updates became an important training paradigm in later representation learning algorithms, but this work used EMA only to produce stable embeddings for negative samples.
SimCLR (2020-02) – ResNet Method: contrastive loss + more augmentations + an MLP projector to capture the effects of augmentations
of training branches: 2
Effect: An MLP projector became the gold standard in representation learning algorithms.
BYOL (2020-06) – ResNet Method: positive pairs only + an asymmetric architecture + stop-gradient + SimCLR augmentations + EMA
of training branches: 2
Effect: Probably the first representation learning method without negative pairs. It inspired DINO and probably JEPA in terms of architectural design.
SwAV (2020-06) – ResNet Method: global/local views + SimCLR augmentations + class prototypes
of training branches: 2
Effect: Its global/local-view training became the standard setting in later representation learning methods.
SimSiam (2020-11) – ResNet Method: BYOL without EMA + a constant learning rate for the predictor
of training branches: 2
Barlow Twins (2021-03) – ResNet Method: global views + SimCLR augmentations + batch-level covariance optimization
of training branches: 2
Effect: The optimization target changed. Previous works used cosine similarity, but this work uses covariance, which explicitly regularizes the latent space.
MoCo v3 (2021-04) – ViT Method: MoCo v1 - memory bank + SimCLR augmentations and an MLP + a frozen first layer
of training branches: 2
Effect: The first work to show that ViT can be used for representation learning.
DINO (2021-04) – ViT Method: BYOL - the predictor + global/local views + softmax distillation + centering + temperature sharpening
of training branches: 2
Effect: Enabled the era of large-scale vision foundation models.
VICReg (2021-05) – ViT Method: Barlow Twins → branch-level covariance + variance + sample-level invariance
of training branches: 2 or 1
Effect: The first representation learning method to support stable one-branch training without EMA, centering, layer freezing, temperature sharpening, or stop-gradient.
MAE (2021-11) – ViT Method: learning representations through pixel reconstruction
of training branches: 1
Effect: A simple, simple, and simple training strategy that is widely used in medical imaging, from what I have heard.
I-JEPA (2023-01) – ViT Method: learning representations through latent prediction
of training branches: 2
Effect: The first representation learning method in the spirit of JEPA. It is also the basis of V-JEPAs, VL-JEPA, and so on.
DINOv2 (2023-04) – ViT Method: DINO v1 + SK centering + KoLeo + LayerScale
of training branches: 2
Effect: The first large vision foundation model to show superior performance across a wide range of downstream tasks.
DINOv3 (2025-08) – ViT Method: DINO v2 + Gram anchoring + flattened schedules
of training branches: 2
Effect: The first large vision foundation model to show superior performance on fine-grained tasks, such as segmentation and depth estimation, and to achieve accuracy comparable to supervised learning methods on ImageNet-1K.
LeJEPA (2025-11) – ViT + others Method: VICReg → full-distribution regularization. It provides mathematical proofs of why an isotropic distribution is the ideal target for the latent space and proposes SIGReg, a method that is linear in the scaling factors.
of training branches: 1
Effect: No heuristics are needed for training stability. It provides a simple solution for various tasks, including world models, such as the LeWM series; multimodal learning, such as LeVLJEPA; drone applications, such as SkyJEPA; and so on.
VISReg (2026-06) – ViT Method: SIGReg → a faster and stronger anti-collapse method that can form an isotropic Gaussian distribution more efficiently. It decomposes the regularization into center, variance, and shape losses, allowing the model to begin introducing isotropy at an early stage of training.
of training branches: 1
Effect: It is too new to summarize concretely.
Similar Articles
@francoisfleuret: Why are Chinese companies releasing very strong open-source models?
A discussion question about the trend of Chinese companies releasing strong open-source AI models.
@jianxliao: That's why OSS models are so important, along with the stack to adopt those OSS models for domain-specific tasks, run t…
Emphasizes the importance of open-source AI models for domain-specific tasks, local deployment, and continuous improvement, advocating for owning intelligence rather than renting it.
@bqbrady: https://x.com/bqbrady/status/2064055370809778371
A detailed personal survey of modern deep learning, focusing on foundation models, vision-language models, and their architectural decisions, written for those who want intuition rather than dense math.
State of Open Source on Hugging Face: Spring 2026
This report analyzes the state of the open source AI ecosystem on Hugging Face in Spring 2026, highlighting significant growth in users, models, and datasets, as well as trends in derivative model creation and specialized sub-communities.
@levie: In a world where there are strong open source alternatives that are only just behind the frontier models, you make your…
A commentary arguing that restricting access to frontier AI models in favor of closed-source alternatives is counterproductive, as strong open-source models close the gap and foreign ecosystems benefit from openness.