@charliermarsh: Why did this go for >1k likes. Are you asking me to tweet about Anthropic more.
Summary
A tweet by Charlie Marsh questioning the version update of Anthropic's Opus AI model from Opus 5 to Opus 5.5, in response to high engagement on social media.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 09/24/26, 12:18 AM
Why did this go for >1k likes. Are you asking me to tweet about Anthropic more.
Charlie Marsh (@charliermarsh): Alright, I’ll bite. Why did they go from Opus 5 to Opus 5.5. Is that a normal sequence.
Similar Articles
@gabriel1: nevermind, opus 5.5 is crazy good
A tweet expressing admiration for Opus 5.5 and comparing OpenAI's and Anthropic's release strategies.
@charliermarsh: Alright, I'll bite. Why did they go from Opus 5 to Opus 5.5. Is that a normal sequence.
A tweet questions the version jump from Opus 5 to Opus 5.5 in AI models, asking if this is a normal sequencing practice.
Opus 5.5 is so good
A post praising the performance of Claude Opus 5.5, highlighting strong positive community reaction to the latest Anthropic model release.
@omarsar0: Dear Anthropic, please don't nerf Opus 5.5. I have been impressed by Opus 5.5 (using it via API). So I resubscribed to …
Omar Sanad (@omarsar0) shares his enthusiasm for Anthropic's Opus 5.5, praising its efficiency and daily-driver quality after resubscribing to Max, and asks Anthropic not to nerf the model.
@mattshumer_: People are loving 5.5. Congrats to Anthropic!
A tweet from Matt Shumer celebrating the positive reception of Anthropic's Claude 5.5 AI model.