When to Retrain: An Empirical Study of Retraining Policies for Streaming ML Under Concept Drift, Budget, and Latency Constraints

arXiv cs.LG Papers

Summary

This paper empirically studies retraining policies for streaming machine learning systems under concept drift, budget, and latency constraints.

arXiv:2608.19488v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Production machine learning systems degrade under concept drift, yet practitioners have little principled guidance on when to retrain. Retraining is costly, retraining budgets are finite, and a retrained model does not take effect instantly: training and deployment latency leave a stale model serving predictions while the data continues to move. We present a controlled empirical study of three practical model-refresh policies (periodic retraining, error-threshold triggering, and statistical drift-triggered retraining with ADWIN) against a no-retrain baseline, evaluated under a unified system model that makes retraining budgets and training-plus-deployment latency explicit. Across 3,933 experiment runs spanning three drift regimes, three budget levels, up to five latency levels, three datasets, and two learning modes, we find that the single most consequential design decision is not the retraining policy but whether the deployed model learns incrementally. With per-sample incremental updates, and for the linear online learner with immediate labels studied here, no policy differs from the no-retrain baseline by a practically significant margin in any of 54 paired comparisons, even at extreme latency. Without incremental updates, policy choice separates outcomes by 15-55 percentage points of post-drift accuracy, and simple periodic retraining significantly outperforms both reactive policies under abrupt and gradual drift, while reactive policies retain an advantage only under recurring drift. We document systematic failure modes of reactive policies and a latency-budget queueing interaction that silently halves effective retraining budgets, and release the full simulator, dataset pipelines, and per-run artifacts for reproducibility.
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 08/21/26, 10:23 AM

# When to Retrain: An Empirical Study of Retraining Policies for Streaming ML Under Concept Drift, Budget, and Latency Constraints
Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19488](https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19488)
Bibliographic Tools

## Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Code, Data, Media

## Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

Demos

## Demos

Related Papers

## Recommenders and Search Tools

IArxiv recommender toggle

About arXivLabs

## arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website\.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy\. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them\.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community?[**Learn more about arXivLabs**](https://info.arxiv.org/labs/index.html)\.

Similar Articles

On Training in Imagination

arXiv cs.LG

This paper analyzes the 'training in imagination' paradigm in model-based reinforcement learning, deriving optimal sample allocation strategies and characterizing how dynamics and reward model errors affect policy returns.