TimeLens2: Generalist Video Temporal Grounding with Multimodal LLMs
Summary
TimeLens2 introduces a generalist video temporal grounding method using multimodal LLMs, treating temporal evidence as an interval set and achieving state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/21/26, 06:35 AM
Paper page - TimeLens2: Generalist Video Temporal Grounding with Multimodal LLMs
Source: https://huggingface.co/papers/2607.17423 Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Abstract
Videomultimodallargelanguagemodels(MLLMs)candescribewhathappensinavideo,butrarelyidentifywhenthesupportingevidenceoccurs.Westudygeneralistvideotemporalgrounding,inwhichonemodelpredictsavariable-cardinalitysetofevidenceintervalsacrossvideolengths,domains,queryforms,andviewpoints.Existingtrainingstrategiesaremisalignedwiththisset-valuedtask:long-videolabelsoftenrelyonbrittleone-passannotation,whilereinforcement-learningrewardseitherfailtodistinguishnon-overlappingpredictionsorrequirefragilesegmentmatching.TimeLens2treatstemporalevidenceasanintervalsetthroughoutsupervisionandoptimization.TimeLens2-93Kconstructsreliablemulti-spansupervisionthroughcaption-derivedproposals,independentlocalization,cross-agentconsensus,semanticverification,andboundaryrefinement.OurtemporalWassersteinrewardcomputesexactone-dimensional\(W_1\)betweenuniformdistributionsovermergedintervalsupports,providingdense,matching-freefeedbackunderunequalcardinalitiesandequivalentfragmentation;temporalIoUcomplementsitwithprecise-overlapfeedback.Acrosssevenbenchmarks,TimeLens2-2Boutperformsallsize-matchedbaselinesoneverybenchmark,whilethe4Band8Bvariantsachievestate-of-the-artperformance,surpassingopen-sourcemodelswithupto397Bparameters.The2B,4B,and8BvariantsimproveovertheirQwen3-VLbackbonesby14.2,13.0,and18.1mIoUpoints,respectively.
View arXiv pageView PDFProject pageGitHub9Add to collection
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607\.17423
Don’t have the latest CLI?curl \-LsSf https://hf\.co/cli/install\.sh \| bash
Models citing this paper3
#### MCG-NJU/TimeLens2-8B Video-Text-to-Text• 9B• Updated16 minutes ago • 708 • 8
#### MCG-NJU/TimeLens2-4B Video-Text-to-Text• 4B• Updated16 minutes ago • 191 • 7
#### MCG-NJU/TimeLens2-2B Video-Text-to-Text• 2B• Updated16 minutes ago • 5
Datasets citing this paper1
#### MCG-NJU/TimeLens2-93K Viewer• Updated16 minutes ago • 71.4k • 791 • 8
Spaces citing this paper2
Collections including this paper0
No Collection including this paper
Add this paper to acollectionto link it from this page.
Similar Articles
Video-MME-Logical: A Controlled Diagnostic Benchmark for Video Temporal-Logical Reasoning
Introduces Video-MME-Logical, a controlled benchmark for evaluating video temporal-logical reasoning in multimodal large language models, revealing a substantial human-model gap.
Watch, Remember, Reason: Human-View Video Understanding with MLLMs
A survey presenting a human-view perspective on video understanding with multimodal large language models, organized around watching, remembering, and reasoning abilities, covering challenges, methods, and applications.
Towards One-to-Many Temporal Grounding
This paper introduces One-to-Many Temporal Grounding (OMTG), a new task for localizing multiple disjoint video segments from a single text query, along with a benchmark, evaluation metrics, a 56k-sample dataset, and novel reward functions that achieve state-of-the-art results, outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro and Seed-1.8.
MemLens: Benchmarking Multimodal Long-Term Memory in Large Vision-Language Models
MemLens is a new benchmark for evaluating memory capabilities in large vision-language models through multi-session conversations. It compares long-context and memory-augmented approaches, revealing limitations in both and motivating hybrid architectures.
What We are Missing in Multimodal LLM Evaluation?
This paper reviews current multimodal LLM evaluation benchmarks and identifies key gaps such as temporal-spatial coherence, physical world understanding, multimodal consistency, and selective attention, arguing that existing isolated-task benchmarks fail to measure true cross-modal integration.