@paul_cal: If you think you're a high, fine-art level dev but you can't break down any parts of your workflow into helpful automat…

X AI KOLs Following News

Summary

Developer paul_cal argues that skilled programmers should be able to automate parts of their workflow with AI, responding to Taylor Lorenz's defense of using AI coding assistants even for non-expert programmers.

If you think you're a high, fine-art level dev but you can't break down any parts of your workflow into helpful automations with AI, I have bad news for you
Original Article
View Cached Full Text

Cached at: 09/06/26, 04:47 PM

If you think you’re a high, fine-art level dev but you can’t break down any parts of your workflow into helpful automations with AI, I have bad news for you

Taylor Lorenz (@TaylorLorenz): Ok, I am a bad programmer. But AI can write better code than me faster than me. So what’s the problem here? I really struggle to understand this mentality when it comes to using AI for coding (which I’d argue it’s actually good at!)

Similar Articles

Using AI to write better code more slowly

Lobsters Hottest

Nolan Lawson argues that AI coding assistants can be used to write high-quality code slowly by employing multiple models for thorough code review and bug detection, improving codebase health rather than maximizing output speed.

On AI Coding and Its Discontents

Lobsters Hottest

Cal Newport reflects on the initial enthusiasm for AI coding tools like Claude Code and the growing disillusionment among developers due to hidden bugs, quality issues, and unsustainable workflows, arguing that outsourcing all code production to AI is not currently viable.

On AI

Lobsters Hottest

The author reflects on his journey from manually typing code on a vintage Macintosh to embracing AI-powered code completion tools like Copilot and Claude, concluding that while the AI industry is problematic, the technology itself can be useful.