DINOv2 way worse than SigLIP in k-NN. Is this expected? [R]
Summary
A researcher reports a surprising 50-point accuracy gap between frozen SigLIP2 (92%) and DINOv2 (41%) embeddings on a fine-grained car classification task using k-NN, seeking insight on whether a linear probe would close the gap or if DINOv2 is unsuited for retrieval.
Similar Articles
LingBot-Vision: masked boundary modeling for self-supervised pretraining (0.296 NYUv2 linear-probe RMSE at 1.1B vs 0.309 for DINOv3-7B, trails on ImageNet); weights in 4 sizes[R]
LingBot-Vision introduces masked boundary modeling for self-supervised pretraining, achieving a 0.296 RMSE on NYUv2 linear-probe with 1.1B parameters versus 0.309 for DINOv3-7B, though it trails on ImageNet; weights are released in four sizes.
Ant Group released LingBot-Vision: DINO-family vision backbones in 4 sizes, and the 0.3B ViT-L matches DINOv3-7B on NYUv2 depth with ~23x fewer params
Ant Group released LingBot-Vision, a family of DINO-style vision backbones in 4 sizes; the 0.3B ViT-L matches DINOv3-7B on NYUv2 depth with ~23x fewer parameters, showcasing significant efficiency gains.
Small-scale check of "good views beat next-token prediction" (Balestriero & LeCun 2026): human captions only, 11M-param encoders [P]
A laptop-scale replication of Balestriero & LeCun's "good views beat next-token prediction" claim using only human COCO captions and 11M-param text encoders confirms the ordering (good views 0.320 > bad views 0.192 > next-token 0.148 on mutual 10-NN with DINOv2), while noting smaller retrieval gaps and scale limitations.
noah-bjorner/dinov3-vit-large-distilled
Deployment of Meta's DINOv3 ViT-L/16 distilled model on Replicate, providing efficient visual embeddings for tasks like similarity search and retrieval.
DeepSeek 0813 "Pro" vs GLM 5.2 & Kimi K3 🐋
A comparison of DeepSeek 0813 'Pro' against GLM 5.2 and Kimi K3, likely covering benchmark performance and capability differences between these AI models.