Multi-Agent Debate and Visual Information Extraction for SeePhys Pro: A 1st-Place Technical Report from ICML 2026 AI4Math Track 3 Challenge
Summary
This technical report presents the 1st-place solution for the SeePhys Pro challenge at ICML 2026's AI4Math Workshop, using a two-stage framework with visual information extraction and multi-agent debate to answer college-level physics questions from images.
View Cached Full Text
Cached at: 07/27/26, 07:43 AM
# Multi-Agent Debate and Visual Information Extraction for SeePhys Pro: A 1st-Place Technical Report from ICML 2026 AI4Math Track 3 Challenge Source: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21946](https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.21946) [View PDF](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.21946) > Abstract:This technical report presents our approach to Challenge Track~3: SeePhys Pro at the 3rd AI for Math Workshop, where the task is to answer college\-level physics questions whose statement and figure may be given partly or entirely as an image\. Visual physics problems become substantially harder for large language models when the decisive information resides in a figure rather than in the text, and this modality gap widens as more of the problem migrates into the image\. We address the task with a two\-stage framework: a visual information extraction stage that re\-expresses figure content as solver\-readable text to close the modality gap, and a reasoning stage that orchestrates three heterogeneous solvers through multi\-agent debate\. Our analysis yields two findings: the gain from orchestration comes from reliable answer selection rather than from additional debate, and the value of a figure aid scales with how much of the problem is locked inside the image\. The resulting pipeline improves overall accuracy over a single\-agent baseline from 0\.643 to 0\.802 on the public split, and won 1st place on both the public and the private leaderboard \(private overall 0\.743\)\. ## Submission history From: Jiseok Kwak \[[view email](https://arxiv.org/show-email/8e9dafd7/2607.21946)\] **\[v1\]**Fri, 24 Jul 2026 03:44:30 UTC \(1,568 KB\)
Similar Articles
Deep Research in Physical Sciences: A Multi-Agent Framework and Comprehensive Benchmark
This paper introduces PhySciBench, a benchmark of 200 expert-curated questions for physical sciences, and DelveAgent, a multi-agent framework that improves accuracy and reduces inference costs compared to baselines like Gemini Deep Research.
Towards Verifiable Multimodal Deep Research: A Multi-Agent Harness for Interleaved Report Generation
This paper presents Ptah, a multi-agent harness for generating verifiable multimodal deep research reports by interleaving textual and visual evidence through specialized agents and verification mechanisms. It introduces PtahEval for evaluation.
A Multi-Agent AI System for Automated High School Transcript Processing: Collaborative Document Analysis at Scale
This paper presents a multi-agent AI system with specialized agents (Pattern Recognition, Semantic Analysis, Vision Intelligence) coordinated by an Orchestration Agent to automatically process diverse high school transcripts, achieving 96.7% accuracy and 45 seconds per transcript on a test set of 40 transcripts from 13 states.
Agent visualisation projects
Covers projects related to visualizing AI agents, possibly tools or libraries for agent behavior representation.
@dair_ai: https://x.com/dair_ai/status/2056018543850754283
A roundup of the top AI papers from May 11-17, covering Lighthouse Attention for long-context pretraining, a comparison of grep vs embedding retrieval for coding agents, and mechanistic interpretability work revealing a geometric calculator in LLMs.